Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33447686›Full record

ReviewJournal of spine surgery (Hong Kong)2020

Implications for diagnosis and treatment of peri-spinal implant infections from experiences in periprosthetic joint infections-a literature comparison and review.

Daniel Karczewski, Matthias Pumberger, Michael Müller, Octavian Andronic, Carsten Perka, Tobias Winkler

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniel KarczewskiCenter for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité - Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Matthias PumbergerCenter for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité - Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Michael MüllerCenter for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité - Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Octavian AndronicBalgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Carsten PerkaCenter for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité - Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Tobias WinklerCenter for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité - Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Both, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and peri-spinal implant infection (PSII) are serious complications occurring in arthroplasty and spine instrumentation with absolute numbers expected to rise in the next years. The currently existing literature data describing the characteristics of PSII are limited when compared to PJI studies. However, both PJI and PSII exhibit similarities concerning pathogenesis, symptoms, diagnosis, treatment and prognosis. This literature review aims at comparing PJI and PSII and to develop implications for diagnosis and treatment of PSII from existing studies about PJI. The review was performed on the basis of a structured PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Medline analysis and existing guidelines, with 99 references being included. The results indicate that specific terms like re-infection should be defined in the context of PSII based on existing definitions of PJI, that

Indexed as

arthroplasty infectioncomparisonPeriprosthetic joint infection (PJI)peri-spinal implant infection (PSII)spine infection

Identifiers

PMID33447686
PMCPMC7797793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.