Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33447611›Full record

ArticleERJ open research2020

Identification of recent exacerbations in COPD patients by electronic nose.

Job J M H van Bragt, Paul Brinkman, Rianne de Vries, Susanne J H Vijverberg, Els J M Weersink, Eric G Haarman, Frans H C de Jongh, Sigrid Kester, Annelies Lucas, Johannes C C M In 't Veen and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ERJ open research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Evolving Landscape of COPD Typization.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Job J M H van BragtAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Dept of Respiratory Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7133-955X
Paul BrinkmanAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Dept of Respiratory Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Rianne de VriesAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Dept of Respiratory Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Susanne J H VijverbergAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Dept of Respiratory Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Els J M WeersinkAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Dept of Respiratory Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Eric G HaarmanAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Dept of Pediatric Respiratory Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Frans H C de JonghMedisch Spectrum Twente, Dept of Pulmonary Function, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Sigrid KesterMedisch Centrum Den Bosch Oost, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.
Annelies LucasDiagnostiek voor U, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Johannes C C M In 't VeenFranciscus Gasthuis and Vlietland/Erasmus MC, Dept of Pulmonology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Peter J SterkAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Dept of Respiratory Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Elisabeth H D BelAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Dept of Respiratory Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Anke H Maitland-van der ZeeAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Dept of Respiratory Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular profiling of exhaled breath by electronic nose (eNose) might be suitable as a noninvasive tool that can help in monitoring of clinically unstable COPD patients. However, supporting data are still lacking. Therefore, as a first step, this study aimed to determine the accuracy of exhaled breath analysis by eNose to identify COPD patients who recently exacerbated, defined as an exacerbation in the previous 3 months. Data for this exploratory, cross-sectional study were extracted from the multicentre BreathCloud cohort. Patients with a physician-reported diagnosis of COPD (n=364) on maintenance treatment were included in the analysis. Exacerbations were defined as a worsening of respiratory symptoms requiring treatment with oral corticosteroids, antibiotics or both. Data analysis involved eNose signal processing, ambient air correction and statistics based on principal component (PC) analysis followed by linear discriminant analysis (LDA). Before analysis, patients were randomly divided into a training (n=254) and validation (n=110) set. In the training set, LDA based on PCs 1-4 discriminated between patients with a recent exacerbation or no exacerbation with high accuracy (receiver operating characteristic (ROC)-area under the curve (AUC)=0.98, 95% CI 0.97-1.00). This high accuracy was confirmed in the validation set (AUC=0.98, 95% CI 0.94-1.00). Smoking, health status score, use of inhaled corticosteroids or vital capacity did not influence these results. Exhaled breath analysis by eNose can discriminate with high accuracy between COPD patients who experienced an exacerbation within 3 months prior to measurement and those who did not. This suggests that COPD patients who recently exacerbated have their own exhaled molecular fingerprint that could be valuable for monitoring purposes.

Identifiers

PMID33447611
PMCPMC7792783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.