Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33447559›Full record

ArticleGland surgery2020

Neoadjuvant docetaxel with or without carboplatin plus dual HER2 blockade for HER2-positive breast cancer: a retrospective multi-center Chinese study.

Minhao Lv, Huihui Guo, Chao Wang, Peiqi Tian, Youzhao Ma, Xiuchun Chen, Suxia Luo

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gland surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07220135 (A Randomized Trial of Neoadjuvant THP vs TCHP for HER2-amplified/Positive Breast Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07220135 phase2recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized Trial of Neoadjuvant THP vs TCHP for HER2-amplified/Positive Breast Cancer (NeoTHERa)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Kansas Medical CenterRan2025 to 2031Enrolled100ConditionsBreast CancerArmsCarboplatin, Docetaxel, Trastuzumab (or biosimilar), Pertuzumab (or biosimilar)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Minhao LvDepartment of Breast Disease, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Huihui GuoDepartment of General Surgery, The Jiyuan People's Hospital, Jiyuan, China.
Chao WangDepartment of General Surgery, The Huaxian People's Hospital, Huaxian, China.
Peiqi TianDepartment of Breast Disease, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Youzhao MaDepartment of Breast Disease, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Xiuchun ChenDepartment of Breast Disease, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Suxia LuoDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Henan Cancer Hospital · CNZhengzhou University · CNCixian People's Hospital · CNFourth People's Hospital of Taiyuan · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to compare the real-world efficacy and safety of the TCbHP regimen (docetaxel, carboplatin, trastuzumab and pertuzumab) and the THP regimen (docetaxel, trastuzumab and pertuzumab) as neoadjuvant therapy for Chinese patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer.

methodsWe compared efficacy and safety outcomes from 72 Chinese patients with HER2-positive breast cancer who underwent neoadjuvant dual HER2 blockade plus TCb or T chemotherapy and surgery between March 2019 and June 2020.

resultsAll 72 patients were women (32-76 years old) and the overall pathological complete response (pCR) rate was 70.8% (51/72). The pCR rates were 76.1% (35/46) for the TCbHP regimen and 61.5% (16/26) for the THP regimen (P=0.28). Univariate analyses revealed that pCR was associated with clinical T classification (P=0.024), AJCC stage (P=0.042), estrogen receptor (ER) status (P=0.002), progesterone receptor (PR) status (P=0.035), Ki-67 index (P<0.001), and immunohistochemical HER2 status (P<0.001). Multivariate analyses revealed that pCR was independently predicted by ER status (OR: 0.227, 95% CI: 0.053-0.852; P=0.032) and immunohistochemical HER2 status (OR: 43.673, 95% CI: 6.801-875.86; P<0.001). The common adverse events for both regimens included neutropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, nausea, and diarrhea. Relative to the THP group, the TCbHP group had higher frequencies of grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia (17%

conclusionsThese results suggest that both TCbHP and THP regimens may be useful neoadjuvant treatments for high-risk early or locally advanced HER2-positive breast cancer. Both regimens had generally good safety outcomes, although clinicians should be aware of the risks of grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia and diarrhea during TCbHP treatment. Elderly patients who require neoadjuvant therapy may benefit from 6 cycles of THP treatment, based on its good efficacy and mild adverse events.

Indexed as

Breast cancerneoadjuvant chemotherapypathological complete responsesafety

Identifiers

PMID33447559
PMCPMC7804556
OpenAlexW3113551001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.