ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2020
Nationwide quality assessment of treatment for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- GOLD Science Committee recommendations for the use of pre- and post-bronchodilator spirometry for the diagnosis of COPD.The European respiratory journal · 2025Guideline
- Joint statement from GOLD/GLI regarding the use of spirometry to define airflow obstruction and diagnose COPD.The European respiratory journal · 2026Article
- Association Between Improvement in Institutional COPD Quality Assessment Grade and Risk of Acute Exacerbations in Primary and Secondary Care: A Nationwide Claims-Based Study.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026Article
- Effects of intensive care unit quality assessment on changes in medical staff in medical institutions and in-hospital mortality.Human resources for health · 2024Article
- Identification of key opportunities for optimising the management of high-risk COPD patients in the UK using the CONQUEST quality standards: an observational longitudinal study.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2023Article
- Clinical Management of COPD in the Real World: Can Studies Reveal Errors in Management and Pathways to Improve Patient Care?Pragmatic and observational research · 2023Review
- The current status of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease awareness, treatments, and plans for improvement in South Korea: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2021Review
- The global status of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Journal of thoracic disease · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) requires careful ambulatory care. If treatment is effective, exacerbation and hospitalization can be preventable. Appropriate management is important; the disease prevalence is high, as is the demand on healthcare resources. Here, we have reported the results of nationwide quality assessment performed with the aims of improving patient management, reducing progression to severe status, and minimizing medical care expenses.
methodsThe Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) engaged in quality assessment three times from May 2014 to April 2017. Medical care institutions were evaluated in terms of the pulmonary function test (PFT), patient revisit, and inhaled bronchodilator prescription rates.
resultsThe numbers of patients assessed were 141,782, 142,790, and 143,339 in years 1, 2, and 3, respectively; the numbers of medical care institutions assessed were 6,691, 6,722, and 6,470, respectively. The PFT implementation rates were 58.7%, 62.5%, and 67.9% for years 1, 2, and 3, respectively; these rates were highest for tertiary hospitals, followed by general and local hospitals, as well as primary healthcare clinics. The repeat visit rates were 85.5%, 92.1%, and 85.0% for years 1, 2, and 3, respectively; these rates were highest for general hospitals, followed by local and tertiary hospitals, and primary healthcare clinics. The inhaled bronchodilator prescription rates were 67.9%, 71.2%, and 76.9% for years 1, 2, and 3, respectively; these rates increased with increasing hospital grade.
conclusionsThe PFT and inhaled bronchodilator prescription rates improved over the 3-year nationwide quality assessment period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.