Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33447355›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in drug safety2020

The effect of different intensivist staffing patterns on the rate of potential drug-drug interactions in adult trauma intensive care units.

Mansoor Masjedi, Mahtabalsadat Mirjalili, Ehsan Mirzaei, Hadis Mirzaee, Afsaneh Vazin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in drug safety, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mansoor MasjediDepartment of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Science, Shiraz, Fars, Iran.
Mahtabalsadat MirjaliliDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Shiraz University of Medical Science, Shiraz, Fars, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0038-1494
Ehsan MirzaeiDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Shiraz University of Medical Science, Shiraz, Fars, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8285-4936
Hadis MirzaeeDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Shiraz University of Medical Science, Shiraz, Fars, Iran.
Afsaneh VazinDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Karafarin Street, PO Box 7146864685, Shiraz, Iran.
Shiraz University · IRShiraz University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDrug-drug interactions (DDIs) have created alarming challenges for public health, especially in those admitted to intensive care units (ICUs). Many studies have shown that involvement of intensivists in the ICUs improves the outcome and decreases the treatment costs. The effect of academic

methodsIn this 6-month cross-sectional study, 200 patients were included. The DDIs were classified into five groups, including type A, B, C, D, and X. pDDIs were defined as interactions belonged to C, D and X categories. Patients in six adult ICUs with three different patterns of intensivist staffing models including type A (once-daily therapeutic intensivist visit followed by 24 h on-call), B (twice-daily academic intensivist visit, 8 h of attendance in ICU and 16 h on-call) and C (all criteria just like ICU type B, except for the presence of therapeutic instead of academic intensivist) were screened for pDDIs.

resultsIn total, 3735 drug orders and 3869 drugs (193 different types) were screened and 1826 pDDIs were identified. Type C, D and X interactions accounted for 60.6%, 35.5%, and 3.9% of all pDDIs, respectively. The mean of pDDI per patient was significantly higher (

conclusionDifferent patterns of intensivist staffing affect pDDIs to varying degrees. In the studied ICUs academic PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: The impact of different intensivist staffing patterns in ICUs on the rate of potential drug-drug interactionsDrug-drug interactions (DDIs) have created alarming challenges for public health, especially in patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs). Many studies have shown that involvement of intensivists in the ICUs improves the outcome and limits the costs. Considering the high incidence of potential DDIs (pDDIs) occurring for critically ill patients and the importance of ADRs caused by pDDIs in ICUs, the effect of the presence of an academic versus therapeutic intensivist, as well as the hour of coverage of intensivist on prevalence of pDDIs was evaluated in six adult trauma ICUs of a level one trauma center in Shiraz, Iran. We also determined the prevalence of pDDIs and their associated risk factors. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that has assessed the effect of various ICU physician staffing models on the incidence and pattern of pDDIs.

Indexed as

drug–drug interactionsICU staffingrisk factorthe intensive care unit

Identifiers

PMID33447355
PMCPMC7780171
OpenAlexW3115088891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.