ArticleJournal of clinical medicine research2020
Gender-Based Differences in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Rupture: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gut Dysbiosis, Sex, and Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2026Review
- Gut microbe-generated metabolite trimethylamine N-oxide and risk of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a cohort study.European heart journal · 2026Article
- Temporal Trends and Demographic Disparities in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Mortality Among U.S. Adults Aged ≥ 65 Years, 1999-2024: A Nationwide Population-Based Analysis of CDC WONDER Data.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Sex-based differences in cardiovascular risk management and abdominal aortic aneurysm growth: Insights from a contemporary cohort study.Atherosclerosis · 2026Article
- Comprehensive evaluation of plasma biomarkers in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm using high-throughput, label-free quantitative proteomic profiling.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2026Article
- Vitamin D deficiency and the long-term risk of new-onset abdominal aortic aneurysm and severe aortic events: a multicenter propensity score-matched cohort study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Sex-specific machine learning classification models improve outcome prediction for abdominal aortic aneurysms.Biology of sex differences · 2025Article
- Clinical characteristics and management for intracranial serpentine aneurysms: a 12-year single-center retrospective analysis of 51 patients.Neurosurgical review · 2025Article
- EVAR Trends over the Past Decade and Their Impact on Aneurysm Mortality: National Health Insurance Data Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Benchmarking bias in embeddings of healthcare AI models: using SD-WEAT for detection and measurement across sensitive populations.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Chemokine Receptor 2 Is a Theranostic Biomarker for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.JACC. Basic to translational science · 2025Article
- Diabetes Is Associated with Lower In-Hospital Mortality in Patients Undergoing Surgical Repair for Aortic Aneurysm Rupture.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Global trends and risk factors of aortic aneurysm mortality from 1990 to 2021: An analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.Asian heart journal · 2025Article
- Sex-Specific Characteristics of Perivascular Fat in Aortic Aneurysms.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Sexual Dimorphism in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm-Insights from Clinical and Experimental Studies.Journal of vascular diseases · 2025Article
- Reporting and analysis of sex in vascular surgery research.Journal of vascular surgery · 2024Review
- A Decade-Long Retrospective Study of Factors Influencing Survival in Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Cross-sectional, multicenter study comparing sex differences in patients undergoing endovascular repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms. Results from the São Paulo State University Provincial Hospitals Registry (RHEUNI).Jornal vascular brasileiro · 2024Article
- Single-Molecule Spatial Transcriptomics of Human Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms Uncovers Calcification-RelatedArteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2023Article
- Elective Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR) for the Treatment of Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms of 5.0-5.5 cm: Differences between Men and Women.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnnually, 5% of sudden deaths are due to abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) rupture. There is evidence suggesting that AAA ruptures have worse outcomes in females than males and the aneurysms rupture at a smaller size in females than in males. The United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends a one-time ultrasound screening for males aged 65 - 75 years who ever smoked. There is insufficient evidence to screen females aged 65 - 75 years who ever smoked though there is evidence suggesting that AAAs rupture at a smaller size and have worse outcomes in females. The objective of this study is to compare the characteristics, mortality and morbidity of ruptured AAAs in females and males.
methodsThis is a retrospective review of 117 patients from two teaching institutions over a period of 6 years. A total of 39 parameters were compared between males and females including demographic variables, comorbidities like hypertension, dyslipidemia, cardiovascular diseases; previous history of AAA; medications, characteristics of aneurysm, type of surgery and its outcome; postoperative complications and long-term survival.
resultsThe overall incidence of AAA rupture was higher in males (68%) than in females (32%). Females die from AAA rupture at a later age. There was a significant difference in the size of AAA rupture between females (mean = 7.4 cm, standard deviation (SD) = 2.0) and males (mean = 8.2 cm, SD = 1.8; P = 0.04). The probability to undergo surgery for ruptured AAA was significantly lower for females as compared to males (P = 0.03). Females had higher overall mortality (P = 0.001), postoperative mortality (P = 0.02), higher length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, incidence of postoperative complications, use of vasopressors and use of ventilator.
conclusionsUsing a similar threshold of size of AAA for elective surgery for both males and females might not be appropriate. Further population-based studies are needed to warrant AAA screening for high-risk females owing to the higher morbidity and mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.