Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33447238›Full record

ArticleBreast care (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Does Internal Mammary Node Irradiation for Breast Cancer Make a Significant Difference to the Diameter of the Internal Mammary Artery? Correlation with Computed Tomography.

Gamze Durhan, Ahmet Gürkan Erdemir, Sezin Yuce Sari, Melis Gultekin, Jale Karakaya, Meltem Gülsün Akpınar, Gökhan Özyiğit, Ferah Yildiz, Figen Demirkazık

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast care (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gamze DurhanDepartment of Radiology, Hacettepe University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey.
Ahmet Gürkan ErdemirDepartment of Radiology, Hacettepe University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey.
Sezin Yuce SariDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey.
Melis GultekinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey.
Jale KarakayaDepartment of Biostatistics, Hacettepe University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey.
Meltem Gülsün AkpınarDepartment of Radiology, Hacettepe University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey.
Gökhan ÖzyiğitDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey.
Ferah YildizDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey.
Figen DemirkazıkDepartment of Radiology, Hacettepe University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey.
Hacettepe University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveLymphatic irradiation in breast cancer improves locoregional control and has been shown to decrease distant metastasis. However, irradiation also accelerates the formation of atherosclerosis and can cause stenosis, not only in the coronary arteries but also in the internal mammary artery (IMA). The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of radiation on IMAs via computed tomography (CT).

methodsWe reviewed the data of 3,612 patients with breast cancer treated with radiotherapy (RT) between January 2010 and December 2016. We included 239 patients with appropriate imaging and nodal irradiation in the study. All patients were treated with lymphatic irradiation of 46-50 Gy, and a boost dose (6-10 Gy) to the involved internal mammary nodes (IMNs) when imaging studies demonstrated pathological enlargement. Bilateral IMA diameter and the presence of calcification were assessed via thin contrast-enhanced CT and those of ipsilateral irradiated IMAs were compared with those of contralateral nonirradiated IMAs.

resultsThe mean diameter of irradiated IMAs was significantly shorter than that of nonirradiated IMAs, regardless of laterality. All vascular calcifications were determined on the irradiated side. A boost dose of radiation to the IMNs and radiation technique did not significantly affect the IMA diameter or the presence of calcification.

conclusionsThe diameter of the IMA is decreased due to RT regardless of laterality, radiation technique, and administration of a boost dose. Evaluation of vessels on CT before coronary artery bypass graft or flap reconstruction can help the surgeon select the most appropriate vessel.

Indexed as

Computed tomographyInternal mammary arteryRadiation therapy

Identifiers

PMID33447238
PMCPMC7768163
OpenAlexW3036824005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.