ReviewBreast care (Basel, Switzerland)2020
Biomarkers in Her2- Positive Disease.
Review in Breast care (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cyclin-Dependent 4/6 Kinase Inhibitors for Treatment of HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: 2026 Update.Cancers · 2026Review
- Standard-of-Care Treatment for HER2+ Metastatic Breast Cancer and Emerging Therapeutic Options.Breast cancer : basic and clinical research · 2024Review
- Nucleic Acid Aptamer-Based Biosensors: A Review.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- Inetetamab in combination with rapamycin and chemotherapy for trastuzumab-treated metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer with abnormal activation of PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- Intratumoral Heterogeneity and Immune Response Indicators to Predict Overall Survival in a Retrospective Study of HER2-Borderline (IHC 2+) Breast Cancer Patients.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBreast cancer is a heterogeneous disease with well-known characteristics such as hormone receptor (HR) status and human epidermal growth factor (Her)2 status. Although Her2 represents an established treatment target, the development of resistance mechanisms during treatment, cardiotoxicity, and a worse response to standard therapies lead to worse outcomes. SUMMARY: Therefore, we investigated various biomarkers in breast cancer such as Her2 mutations, Her2 heterogeneity, HR, PIK3CA, PTEN, programmed death receptor ligand 1 (PD-L1), tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL), micro RNA (miRNA), and BRCA mutations with regard to their clinical impact in Her2-positive disease. HR status and Her2 status, such as the presence of PIK3CA mutations, already play a role in treatment decision-making processes, whereas other biomarkers like PD-L1 status or TIL represent promising future markers. The influence of BRCA mutations in Her2-positive disease, Her2 mutations, and the impact of miRNA is vague to date. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) such as T-DM have been established as important treatment strategies, especially in Her2-positive disease. KEY MESSAGE: However, up-to-date biomarkers appropriate for clinical practice are missing. Further studies are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.