Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33447149›Full record

ArticleBritish paramedic journal2019

Protocol for the impact of paramedics in NHS primary care: application of realist approaches to improve understanding and support intelligent policy and future workforce planning.

Georgette Eaton, Veronika Williams, Geoff Wong, Nia Roberts, Kamal R Mahtani

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British paramedic journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Georgette EatonUniversity of Oxford; London Ambulance Service NHS Trust: ORCID iD: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9421-2845.
Veronika WilliamsNipissing University; University of Oxford: ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5660-8224.
Geoff WongUniversity of Oxford: ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5384-4157.
Nia RobertsUniversity of Oxford.
Kamal R MahtaniUniversity of Oxford: ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7791-8552.
Nipissing University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn the United Kingdom, changing demands on ambulance services has caused a change in what is expected of a paramedic. As well as advanced life support, paramedics now need to be skilled in managing a range of urgent case presentations, with emphasis on treat-at-scene. The change in the scope of work paramedics can undertake has established their role within primary care. However, as paramedics transition to roles within primary care, their knowledge and skillset will undoubtedly need to change. The current opportunities for paramedics' employment in primary care require careful evaluation. In order to contribute to patients' and the NHS' primary care agenda, evidence must be generated to show how and why these changes would work, for whom, in what context and to what extent. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The purpose of this research is to produce findings that will improve our understanding of the ways in which (i.e. how, why and in what contexts) paramedics impact on the primary care workforce. A theory-driven approach to evidence-synthesis will be conducted in a realist review, to produce a programme theory. This programme theory will be tested using empirical data collected through a realist evaluation. Survey and interview data will be collected from paramedics working in primary care, general practitioners and patients to assess under which contexts, and by which mechanisms, paramedics are working in primary care, and thus test the programme theory. Based on the findings, we will be able to highlight the role of paramedics in primary care, as well as how they operate and under what conditions. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Formal ethics review is not required for the review, as it is secondary research, but will be sought for the evaluation. Findings will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal, at national and international conferences and to relevant professional associations.

Indexed as

paramedicsprimary carerealist approachesurgent care

Identifiers

PMID33447149
PMCPMC7783924
OpenAlexW2991033526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.