Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33447146›Full record

ArticleBritish paramedic journal2019

Optimising ambulance service contribution to clinical trials: a phenomenological exploration using focus groups.

Helen Pocock, Michelle Thomson, Sarah Taylor, Charles D Deakin, Ed England

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British paramedic journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Helen PocockSouth Central Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust: ORCID iD: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7648-5313.
Michelle ThomsonSouth Central Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust.
Sarah TaylorSouth Central Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust.
Charles D DeakinSouth Central Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust: ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2565-9771.
Ed EnglandSouth Central Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust: ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8009-2843.
South Western Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOut-of-hospital cardiac arrest trials can prove challenging and there is a need to share learning from those that have recruited successfully. We have just completed three years of recruitment to PARAMEDIC2, a placebo-controlled trial of adrenaline in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. This study was designed to describe the experience of operational ambulance staff involved in recruiting patients into PARAMEDIC2.

methodsFour focus groups involving trial paramedics and supporting members of the emergency care team were conducted across different geographical regions of a single UK ambulance service participating in the PARAMEDIC2 study. Data analysis was supported by NVivo 12 and themes were identified using a thematic analysis approach.

resultsForty-four participants contributed to the focus groups. Four overarching themes were identified:

conclusionsThis study has provided insights into paramedic experience of a large-scale pre-hospital trial. Investment in time and resource to provide face-to-face training and personalised feedback to paramedics can foster engagement and optimise performance.

Indexed as

cardiac arrestethicsout-of-hospital researchparamedicpre-hospital trials

Identifiers

PMID33447146
PMCPMC7783917
OpenAlexW4234168021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.