Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33447014›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2021

Repeatability of Vascular Density Measurement of the Three Retinal Plexus Layers Using OCT Angiography in Pathologic Eyes (OCTA Vascular Density Repeatability of Three Plexus Layers).

Lekha Mukkamala, Michael Nguyen, Melinda Chang, Susanna S Park

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Brain and retina in Alzheimer's disease: Pathological intersections and estimates from imaging.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Optical coherence tomography angiography in diabetic retinopathy.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lekha MukkamalaDepartment of Ophthalmology & Vision Science, University of California Davis Eye Center, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Michael NguyenDepartment of Ophthalmology & Vision Science, University of California Davis Eye Center, Sacramento, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9420-8563
Melinda ChangDepartment of Ophthalmology & Vision Science, University of California Davis Eye Center, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Susanna S ParkDepartment of Ophthalmology & Vision Science, University of California Davis Eye Center, Sacramento, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5911-6671
University of California, Davis · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAlthough commercial optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) machines quantitate retinal vascular density (VD) by dividing the vasculature into superficial and deep capillary plexus (SCP, DCP), histology reveals three distinct plexus layers. This study tested the hypothesis that the VD measurement of three distinct retinal plexus layers obtained using custom segmentation has high repeatability comparable to that of automatically segmented SCP and DCP layers. MATERIALS AND

methodsForty-four participants (86 eyes) were enrolled - 54 eyes with retinal vasculopathy and 25 eyes with macular edema. Macular OCTA images (3x3 mm and 6x6 mm) were obtained twice within 30 minutes by the same personnel using the same instrument (AngioVue, Optovue, version 2018.0.0.18). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated to access repeatability.

resultsThe repeatability of VD for SCP and DCP was good-to-moderate (ICC=0.65-0.85) and minimally affected by image quality, retinal vasculopathy, or macular edema. The repeatability of the VD of the custom-segmented intermediate and deep plexus layers (cICP and cDCP) was poor/moderate (ICC=0.40-0.74) but better in the subset without macular edema using 3x3 mm scans with good images quality (ICC=0.58-0.93). Repeatability of cICP and cDCP VD measurement for 6x6 mm scans was poor (ICC≤0.5) in eyes with retinal vasculopathy and/or macular edema.

conclusionAlthough repeatability of the VD measurement is high for the automatically segmented SCP and DCP, repeatability of VD is poor for the cICP and cDCP using larger scans in eyes with retinal vasculopathy and/or macular edema.

Indexed as

deep retinal plexusintermediate retinal plexusmacular edemamiddle retinal plexusretinal vasculopathy

Identifiers

PMID33447014
PMCPMC7802913
OpenAlexW3118984346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.