ArticleEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2021
Role of dietitian support in improving weight loss and nutrition impact symptoms after oesophageal cancer surgery.
Article in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predictive factors for prolonged nutritional support after oesophagogastric cancer resection.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOesophageal cancer is frequently accompanied with malnutrition. We aimed to evaluate if early support from dietitians and patient's level of satisfaction with the support from dietitians are associated with better outcomes for weight loss and nutrition impact symptoms (NIS).
methodsA nationwide and prospective cohort study on patients operated for oesophageal cancer in Sweden from 2013 onwards, included one year after surgery. Study exposures were (1) preoperative dietitian support (yes vs no) and, (2) patient reported satisfaction with dietitian support (high vs low) and outcomes were postoperative (1) percentage weight loss and (2) NIS score (range 0-24); one year after surgery. An ANCOVA model adjusted for predefined confounders was used and presented as mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
resultsAmong 245 patients, as many as 57% had received preoperative dietitian support. Preoperative dietitian support was not associated with statistically significant differences in mean postoperative weight loss (MD 0.2 [95% CI -2.6 to 2.9]) and mean NIS score (MD 0.1 [95% CI: -0.8 to 1.0]). Likewise, satisfaction with the dietitian support was not associated with significant differences in mean postoperative weight loss (MD 1.4 [95% CI: -1.5 to 4.3]) and NIS score (MD -0.1 [95% CI: -1 to 0.8]).
conclusionsLong-term postoperative weight loss and NIS were not influenced based on whether dietitian support was initiated preoperatively or not and patient's satisfaction level with dietitian support. Similarity in results may reflect effective screening of malnutrition and dietitian support in centres treating oesophageal cancer in Sweden.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.