Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33446890›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Predicting adult neuroscience intensive care unit admission from emergency department triage using a retrospective, tabular-free text machine learning approach.

Eyal Klang, Benjamin R Kummer, Neha S Dangayach, Amy Zhong, M Arash Kia, Prem Timsina, Ian Cossentino, Anthony B Costa, Matthew A Levin, Eric K Oermann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Using natural language processing in emergency medicine health service research: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Eyal Klang *Institute for Healthcare Delivery Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Benjamin R Kummer *Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave Levy Place, Box 1137, New York, NY, USA. benjamin.kummer@mountsinai.org.
Neha S DangayachDepartment of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave Levy Place, Box 1137, New York, NY, USA.
Amy ZhongIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
M Arash KiaInstitute for Healthcare Delivery Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Prem TimsinaInstitute for Healthcare Delivery Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Ian CossentinoIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Anthony B CostaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Matthew A LevinInstitute for Healthcare Delivery Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Eric K OermannDepartment of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early admission to the neurosciences intensive care unit (NSICU) is associated with improved patient outcomes. Natural language processing offers new possibilities for mining free text in electronic health record data. We sought to develop a machine learning model using both tabular and free text data to identify patients requiring NSICU admission shortly after arrival to the emergency department (ED). We conducted a single-center, retrospective cohort study of adult patients at the Mount Sinai Hospital, an academic medical center in New York City. All patients presenting to our institutional ED between January 2014 and December 2018 were included. Structured (tabular) demographic, clinical, bed movement record data, and free text data from triage notes were extracted from our institutional data warehouse. A machine learning model was trained to predict likelihood of NSICU admission at 30 min from arrival to the ED. We identified 412,858 patients presenting to the ED over the study period, of whom 1900 (0.5%) were admitted to the NSICU. The daily median number of ED presentations was 231 (IQR 200-256) and the median time from ED presentation to the decision for NSICU admission was 169 min (IQR 80-324). A model trained only with text data had an area under the receiver-operating curve (AUC) of 0.90 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87-0.91). A structured data-only model had an AUC of 0.92 (95% CI 0.91-0.94). A combined model trained on structured and text data had an AUC of 0.93 (95% CI 0.92-0.95). At a false positive rate of 1:100 (99% specificity), the combined model was 58% sensitive for identifying NSICU admission. A machine learning model using structured and free text data can predict NSICU admission soon after ED arrival. This may potentially improve ED and NSICU resource allocation. Further studies should validate our findings.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalHospitalizationMachine LearningNatural Language ProcessingTriageAdultFemaleHumansMaleNervous System DiseasesNeurosciencesNew York CityRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID33446890
PMCPMC7809037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.