Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33446812›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2021

Sleep reactivation did not boost suppression-induced forgetting.

Eitan Schechtman, Anna Lampe, Brianna J Wilson, Eunbi Kwon, Michael C Anderson, Ken A Paller

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. When memories get complex, sleep comes to their rescue.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  4. The reach of reactivation: Effects of consciously triggered versus unconsciously triggered reactivation of associative memory.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Eitan SchechtmanDepartment of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, 60208, USA. eitan.schechtman@northwestern.edu.
Anna LampeDepartment of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, 60208, USA.
Brianna J WilsonDepartment of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, 60208, USA.
Eunbi KwonDepartment of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, 60208, USA.
Michael C AndersonMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 7EF, UK.
Ken A PallerDepartment of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, 60208, USA.
Northwestern University · USMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit · GB

Funding

The role of context in sleep-related memory reactivation in humansK99MH122663 · NIMH · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI SCHECHTMAN-DRAYMAN, EITAN · 2021 to 2022
$186k
Medical Research Council MC_UU_00005/1NIMH NIH HHS K99 MH122663
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sleep's role in memory consolidation is widely acknowledged, but its role in weakening memories is still debated. Memory weakening is evolutionary beneficial and makes an integral contribution to cognition. We sought evidence on whether sleep-based memory reactivation can facilitate memory suppression. Participants learned pairs of associable words (e.g., DIET-CREAM) and were then exposed to hint words (e.g., DIET) and instructed to either recall ("think") or suppress ("no-think") the corresponding target words (e.g., CREAM). As expected, suppression impaired retention when tested immediately after a 90-min nap. To test if reactivation could selectively enhance memory suppression during sleep, we unobtrusively presented one of two sounds conveying suppression instructions during sleep, followed by hint words. Results showed that targeted memory reactivation did not enhance suppression-induced forgetting. Although not predicted, post-hoc analyses revealed that sleep cues strengthened memory, but only for suppressed pairs that were weakly encoded before sleep. The results leave open the question of whether memory suppression can be augmented during sleep, but suggest strategies for future studies manipulating memory suppression during sleep. Additionally, our findings support the notion that sleep reactivation is particularly beneficial for weakly encoded information, which may be prioritized for consolidation.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMemory ConsolidationMental RecallSleep

Identifiers

PMID33446812
PMCPMC7809483
OpenAlexW3120582190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.