ArticleScientific reports2021
Multifocal acceptance score to evaluate vision: MAS-2EV.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Presbyopia: Current Perspectives and Prospects for Patients.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026Review
- Assessing Ocular Dominance: Rethinking the Current Paradigm.Journal of cataract and refractive surgery · 2025Article
- Visual simulation of intraocular lenses: technologies and applications [Invited].Biomedical optics express · 2025Review
- Perceptual cost and benefit of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses: effect of energy balance, addition, and adaptation.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
- Spatiotemporal defocus sensitivity function of the human visual system.Biomedical optics express · 2023Article
- Monovision Correction Preference and Eye Dominance Measurements.Translational vision science & technology · 2023Article
- New insights in presbyopia: impact of correction strategies.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2023Review
- Multifocal contact lens vision simulated with a clinical binocular simulator.Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association · 2022Article
- Adaptive optics visual simulators: a review of recent optical designs and applications [Invited].Biomedical optics express · 2022Review
- Article
- Optical and visual quality of real intraocular lenses physically projected on the patient's eye.Biomedical optics express · 2021Article
- Vision with spatial light modulator simulating multifocal contact lenses in an adaptive optics system.Biomedical optics express · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present a new metric (Multifocal Acceptance Score, MAS-2EV) to evaluate vision with presbyopic corrections. The MAS-2EV is based on a set of images representing natural visual scenes at day and night conditions projected in far and near displays, and a near stereo target. Subjects view and score the images through different binocular corrections (monofocal corrections at far; bifocal corrections; monovision and modified monovision) administered with soft contact lenses (in cyclopleged young subjects) or with a binocular simultaneous vision simulator (in presbyopic and cyclopleged young subjects). MAS-2EV scores are visually represented in the form of polygons, and quantified using different metrics: overall visual quality, visual degradation at far, visual benefit at near, near stereo benefit, visual imbalance near-far, overall visual imbalance and a combined overall performance metric. We have found that the MAS-2EV has sufficient repeatability and sensitivity to allow differentiation across corrections with only two repetitions, and the duration of the psychophysical task (3 min for subject/condition/correction) makes it useable in the clinic. We found that in most subjects binocular bifocal corrections produce the lowest visual imbalance, and the highest near stereo benefit. 46.67% of the subjects ranked binocular bifocal corrections first, and 46.67% of the subjects ranked monovision first. MAS-2EV, particularly in combination with visual simulators, can be applied to select prospective presbyopic corrections in patients prior to contact lens fitting or intraocular lens implantation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.