Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33446701›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Shear wave cardiovascular MR elastography using intrinsic cardiac motion for transducer-free non-invasive evaluation of myocardial shear wave velocity.

Marian Amber Troelstra, Jurgen Henk Runge, Emma Burnhope, Alessandro Polcaro, Christian Guenthner, Torben Schneider, Reza Razavi, Tevfik F Ismail, Jordi Martorell, Ralph Sinkus

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Marian Amber Troelstra *School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Jurgen Henk Runge *School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Emma Burnhope *School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Alessandro PolcaroDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Material Sciences, IQS School of Engineering, Universitat Ramon Llull, Via Augusta 390, 08017, Barcelona, Spain.
Christian GuenthnerInstitute for Biomedical Engineering, University and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Torben SchneiderSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Reza RazaviSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Tevfik F IsmailSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Jordi MartorellDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Material Sciences, IQS School of Engineering, Universitat Ramon Llull, Via Augusta 390, 08017, Barcelona, Spain. Jordi.martorell@iqs.url.edu.
Ralph SinkusSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust WT 203148/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Changes in myocardial stiffness may represent a valuable biomarker for early tissue injury or adverse remodeling. In this study, we developed and validated a novel transducer-free magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) approach for quantifying myocardial biomechanics using aortic valve closure-induced shear waves. Using motion-sensitized two-dimensional pencil beams, septal shear waves were imaged at high temporal resolution. Shear wave speed was measured using time-of-flight of waves travelling between two pencil beams and corrected for geometrical biases. After validation in phantoms, results from twelve healthy volunteers and five cardiac patients (two left ventricular hypertrophy, two myocardial infarcts, and one without confirmed pathology) were obtained. Torsional shear wave speed in the phantom was 3.0 ± 0.1 m/s, corresponding with reference speeds of 2.8 ± 0.1 m/s. Geometrically-biased flexural shear wave speed was 1.9 ± 0.1 m/s, corresponding with simulation values of 2.0 m/s. Corrected septal shear wave speeds were significantly higher in patients than healthy volunteers [14.1 (11.0-15.8) m/s versus 3.6 (2.7-4.3) m/s, p = 0.001]. The interobserver 95%-limits-of-agreement in healthy volunteers were ± 1.3 m/s and interstudy 95%-limits-of-agreement - 0.7 to 1.2 m/s. In conclusion, myocardial shear wave speed can be measured using aortic valve closure-induced shear waves, with cardiac patients showing significantly higher shear wave speeds than healthy volunteers. This non-invasive measure may provide valuable insights into the pathophysiology of heart failure.

Indexed as

Elasticity Imaging TechniquesMagnetic Resonance ImagingModels, CardiovascularMyocardial ContractionFemaleHumansHypertrophy, Left VentricularMaleMyocardial Infarction

Identifiers

PMID33446701
PMCPMC7809276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.