ArticleCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2021
A comparative study of methods for determining Intravoxel incoherent motion parameters in cervix cancer.
Article in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advanced Diffusion MRI in Cervical Cancer: A Comprehensive Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Field-of-View Optimized and Constrained Undistorted Single-Shot Study of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Intravoxel Incoherent Motion for the Uterus and Cervix in Females of Childbearing Age and Postmenopause: A Prospective StudyCurrent medical imaging · 2026Article
- MRI cytometry imaging for cervical cancer differential diagnosis: a preliminary study.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Multi-model quantitative MRI of uterine cancers in precision medicine's era-a narrative review.Insights into imaging · 2025Article
- SpinFlowSim: A blood flow simulation framework for histology-informed diffusion MRI microvasculature mapping in cancer.Medical image analysis · 2025Article
- Test-retest repeatability of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) measurements in the cervical cord.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Parametric response mapping of co-registered intravoxel incoherent motion magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography in locally advanced cervical cancer undergoing concurrent chemoradiation therapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2024Article
- Multiparametric MRI for evaluation of pathological response to the neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy in resectable non-small-cell lung cancer.European radiology · 2023Article
- Intravoxel Incoherent Motion (IVIM) MR Quantification in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer (LACC): Preliminary Study on Assessment of Tumor Aggressiveness and Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Post treatment imaging in patients with local advanced cervical carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo compare different fitting methods for determining IVIM (Intravoxel Incoherent Motion) parameters and to determine whether the use of different IVIM fitting methods would affect differentiation of cervix cancer from normal cervix tissue.
methodsDiffusion-weighted echo-planar imaging of 30 subjects was performed on a 3.0 T scanner with b-values of 0, 30, 100, 200, 400, 1000 s/mm
resultsNo significant difference was found between IVIM parameters derived from the segmented method with b-value cutoff of 200 s/mm
conclusionsIVIM parameters derived using fitting methods with small cutoff b-values could be different, however, the segmented method with b-value cutoff of 200 s/mm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.