Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33446192›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2021

Developing a family-reported measure of experiences with home-based pediatric palliative and hospice care: a multi-method, multi-stakeholder approach.

Jackelyn Y Boyden, Chris Feudtner, Janet A Deatrick, Kimberley Widger, Gwenn LaRagione, Blyth Lord, Mary Ersek

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Integrating parent voices into research at the extremes of prematurity: what are we doing and where should we go?Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Jackelyn Y BoydenSchool of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, 418 Curie Blvd, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. boydenj@chop.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9697-8921
Chris FeudtnerChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Janet A DeatrickSchool of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, 418 Curie Blvd, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Kimberley WidgerLawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Gwenn LaRagioneChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Blyth LordCourageous Parents Network, Newton, MA, USA.
Mary ErsekSchool of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, 418 Curie Blvd, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · USPhiladelphia VA Medical Center · USProtein Express (United States) · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Home-based Pediatric Palliative Care Outcomes StudyF31NR017554 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BOYDEN, JACKELYN Y · 2018 to 2020
$98k
NINR NIH HHS F31 NR017554NINR NIH HHS F31NR017554
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany children with serious illnesses are receiving palliative and end-of-life care from pediatric palliative and hospice care teams at home (PPHC@Home). Despite the growth in PPHC@Home, no standardized measures exist to evaluate whether PPHC@Home provided in the U.S. meets the needs and priorities of children and their families.

methodsWe developed and conducted a preliminary evaluation of a family-reported measure of PPHC@Home experiences using a multi-method, multi-stakeholder approach. Our instrument development process consisted of four phases. Item identification and development (Phase 1) involved a comprehensive literature search of existing instruments, guidelines, standards of practice, and PPHC@Home outcome studies, as well as guidance from a PPHC stakeholder panel. Phase 2 involved the initial item prioiritization and reduction using a discrete choice experiment (DCE) with PPHC professionals and parent advocates. Phase 3 involved a second DCE with bereaved parents and parents currently receiving care for their child to further prioritize and winnow the items to a set of the most highly-valued items. Finally, we conducted cognitive interviews with parents to provide information about the content validity and clarity of the newly-developed instrument (Phase 4).

resultsItems were compiled predominantly from three existing instruments. Phase 2 participants included 34 PPHC providers, researchers, and parent advocates; Phase 3 participants included 47 parents; and Phase 4 participants included 11 parents. At the completion of Phase 4, the Experiences of Palliative and Hospice Care for Children and Caregivers at Home (EXPERIENCE@Home) Measure contains 22 of the most highly-valued items for evaluating PPHC@Home. These items include "The care team treats my child's physical symptoms so that my child has as good a quality of life as possible", "I have regular access to on-call services from our care team", and "The nurses have the knowledge, skills, and experience to support my child's palliative or hospice care at home."

conclusionsThe EXPERIENCE@Home Measure is the first known to specifically measure family-reported experiences with PPHC@Home in the U.S. Future work will include formal psychometric evaluation with a larger sample of parents, as well as evaluation of the clinical utility of the instrument with PPHC@Home teams.

Indexed as

Hospice CareHospicesTerminal CareChildHumansPalliative CareParentsQuality of LifeExperience with careHome-based careInstrument developmentPediatric hospice carePediatric palliative care

Identifiers

PMID33446192
PMCPMC7809872
OpenAlexW3123614773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.