Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33446167›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2021

Improving osteoarthritis management in primary healthcare: results from a quasi-experimental study.

Nina Østerås, Irma Brandeggen Blaker, Tore Hjortland, Elizabeth Cottrell, Jonathan G Quicke, Krysia S Dziedzic, Steven Blackburn, Aksel Paulsen

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02876120 (The STavanger osteoARThritis Study in Primary Health Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02876120 nacompletednot on this map

The STavanger osteoARThritis Study in Primary Health Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorDiakonhjemmet HospitalRan2016 to 2017Enrolled330ConditionsKnee Osteoarthritis, Hip OsteoarthritisArmsImplementation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Osteoarthritis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Autophagic LC3Science advances · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nina ØsteråsDivision of Rheumatology and Research, National Advisory Unit on Rehabilitation in Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway. nina.osteras@medisin.uio.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8602-342X
Irma Brandeggen BlakerHillevåg Fysioterapi og Trening, Stavanger, Norway.
Tore HjortlandLegesenteret Mariero, Stavanger, Norway.
Elizabeth CottrellImpact Accelerator Unit, Versus Arthritis Primary Care Centre, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK.
Jonathan G QuickeImpact Accelerator Unit, Versus Arthritis Primary Care Centre, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK.
Krysia S DziedzicImpact Accelerator Unit, Versus Arthritis Primary Care Centre, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK.
Steven BlackburnImpact Accelerator Unit, Versus Arthritis Primary Care Centre, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK.
Aksel PaulsenDepartment of Orthopaedics, Division of Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.

Funding

Department of Health KMRF-2014-03-002Department of Health RP-PG-0407-10386EIT Health 18430National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Knowledge Mobilisation Research Fellowship KMRF-2014-03-002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo improve quality of care for patients with hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA), general practitioners (GPs) and physiotherapists (PTs) in a Norwegian municipality initiated an intervention. The intervention aimed to increase provision of core OA treatment (information, exercise, and weight control) prior to referral for surgery, rational use of imaging for assessing OA and improve communication between healthcare professionals. This study assessed the effectiveness of this intervention.

methodsForty-eight PTs and one hundred one GPs were invited to the intervention that included two interactive workshops outlining best practice and an accompanying template for PT discharge reports. Using interrupted time series research design, the study period was divided into three: pre-implementation, transition (implementation) and post-implementation. Comparing the change between pre- and post-implementation, the primary outcome was patient-reported quality of OA care measured with the OsteoArthritis Quality Indicator questionnaire. Secondary outcomes were number of PT discharge reports, information included in GP referral letters to orthopaedic surgeon, the proportion of GP referral letters indicating use of core treatment, and the use of imaging within OA assessment. Analyses involved linear mixed and logistic regression models.

resultsThe PT workshop had 30 attendees, and 31 PTs and 33 GPs attended the multidisciplinary workshop. Two hundred eight and one hundred twenty-five patients completed the questionnaire during pre- and post-implementation, respectively. The adjusted model showed a small, statistically non-significant, increase in mean total score for quality of OA care (mean change = 4.96, 95% CI -0.18, 10.12, p:0.057), which was mainly related to items on OA core treatment. Patients had higher odds of reporting receipt of information on treatment alternatives (odds ratio (OR) 1.9, 95% CI 1.08, 3.24) and on self-management (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.33, 4.32) in the post-implementation phase. There was a small, statistically non-significant, increase in the proportion of GP referral letters indicating prior use of core treatment modalities. There were negligible changes in the number of PT discharge reports, in the information included in the GP referral letters, and in the use of imaging for OA assessment.

conclusionThis study suggests that a primary care intervention including two inter-active workshops can shift the quality of care towards best practice recommendations.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02876120 .

Indexed as

General PractitionersOsteoarthritis, HipOsteoarthritis, KneeHumansNorwayPrimary Health CareImplementationOsteoarthritisQuality of care

Identifiers

PMID33446167
PMCPMC7807869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.