ArticleBMC oral health2021
Patient satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life 10 years after implant placement.
Article in BMC oral health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Changes of Dental Anxiety, Aesthetic Perception and Oral Health-related Quality of Life Related to Influencing Factors of Patients' Demographics After Anterior Implant Treatment
Evaluation of Bite Force, Quality of Life, and Patients' Satisfaction of Edentulous Patients Using Complete Dentures and Implant-Supported Overdentures: An in Vivo Study
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed.
- Redefining Success in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: Bridging the Gap Between Technical Outcomes and Patient Quality of Life.Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand · 2026Review
- Long-Term Patient Satisfaction and Oral Health-Related Quality of Life Following Anterior Maxillary Implant Placement: A Five-Year Follow-Up Study.European journal of dentistry · 2026Article
- Validity and reliability of the Spanish version of the Dental Impact on Daily Living (Sp-DIDL) questionnaire in a Spanish population: a cross-sectional study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Perioperative pain-anxiety response profiles and their predictors in patients undergoing dental implant surgery: a latent profile analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Observational
- CBCT assessment of crestal bone changes and stability: Immediate versus delayed implant placement in grafted sites.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- The implant treatment experience and knowledge scale: reliability and validity of a patient-reported outcome measure for dental implant therapy.Frontiers in oral health · 2026Article
- Assessing Esthetic and Functional Benefits of Three Types of Maxillary Partial Denture Designs over Five Years.Dentistry journal · 2025Article
- Clinical Performance of Subperiosteal Implants in the Full-Arch Rehabilitation of Severely Resorbed Edentulous Jaws: A Systematic Review and Metanalysis.Dentistry journal · 2025Review
- Psychosocial Impact of Maxilla-For-AllJournal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Metabolomics Applications for Diagnosing Peri-Implantitis: A Systematic Review of In Vivo Studies.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- A New Approach for Reconstruction of Severe Horizontal Atrophy of the Posterior Mandible Using "The Honeycomb Technique": A 10-14 Year Follow-Up Retrospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Horizontal vascular-stalked split osteotomy (HVSO): a bone augmentation technique for the atrophic jaw- a retrospective cohort study in 29 patients.International journal of implant dentistry · 2025Article
- Patient-reported outcomes of esthetics, function and oral hygiene with single dental implants 10-15 years after placement: a cross-sectional study.Acta odontologica Scandinavica · 2025Article
- Article
- Modified oral implant restoration improves dental aesthetics, function, and patient satisfaction in maxillary anterior tooth loss.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
- Impact of CAD-CAM technology and abutment angulation on prosthesis design for anterior maxillary implants: An original research study.Bioinformation · 2025Article
- Implants as anchorage for the correction of localized dental malocclusion: a retrospective clinical study.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Article
- Periodontal Patients' Perceptions and Knowledge of Dental Implants-A Questionnaire Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Oral health-related quality of life in implant-supported rehabilitations: a prospective single-center observational cohort study.BMC oral health · 2024Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundImplant survival and implant success (freedom of biologic complications) are important factors in assessing the success of implant therapy. However, these factors are not the only determinants. Patients' satisfaction also plays a very important role in daily practice. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess patients' satisfaction regarding function (phonetics, chewing comfort, stability, cleanability) and aesthetics in patients treated with XiVE and Frialite implants in a private periodontal practice ten years after implant placement. Furthermore, oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) was evaluated.
methodsPatient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) regarding overall satisfaction, phonetics, chewing comfort, stability, cleanability, and aesthetics were examined on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) 10 years ± 6 months after implant placement in a cross-sectional survey. OHRQoL and psychological impact were assessed via the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) and Psychosocial Impact of Dental Aesthetics Questionnaire (PIDAQ). Potential influence of patient-related factors (age, gender, smoking, peri-implantitis, implant position, type of restoration) on VAS, OHRQoL and PIDAQ were investigated using regression analyses.
resultsHigh satisfaction with implant-supported restorations was seen in all 95 patients ten years after implant placement. Mean VAS-score for general satisfaction with implant-supported restoration was 93.0% (SD ± 9.4, median: 96.3%, range 50.0-100%). Mean OHIP score was 11.3 (SD ± 10.8, median: 9.0, range 0-45), mean PIDAQ score 20.5 (SD ± 11.37, median: 17.0, range 0-52). A slight tendency that presence of a moderate/severe peri-implantitis lowers satisfaction could be detected (overall satisfaction: ordinal, p = 0.012, VAS, p = 0.026). Also, the factors age, implant position and type of restoration might have an impact on patient's satisfaction.
conclusionsPatients restored with mostly fixed implant-supported restorations showed a very high patient satisfaction regarding function and aesthetics 10-year after implant placement. The presence of a moderate/severe peri-implantitis showed a slight tendency for influencing patient satisfaction. Due to the cross-sectional design results have to be interpreted with care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.