Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33446148›Full record

Observational studyBMC cancer2021

Effect of antiangiogenic-based treatment and systemic inflammatory factors on outcomes in patients with BRAF v600-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer: a real-world study in Spain.

Nieves Martínez-Lago, Ana Fernández-Montes, Marta Covela, Elena M Brozos, Juan De la Cámara, José C Méndez Méndez, Mónica Jorge-Fernández, Antía Cousillas Castiñeiras, Cristina Reboredo, David Arias Ron and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Nieves Martínez-LagoMedical Oncology Department, University Hospital A Coruña, Xubias de Arriba, 84, 15006, A Coruña, Galicia, Spain. Nieves.Purificacion.Martinez.Lago@sergas.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0408-6871
Ana Fernández-MontesComplexo Hospitalario Universitario de Ourense, Ourense, Galicia, Spain.
Marta CovelaHospital Universitario Lucus Augusti, Lugo, Galicia, Spain.
Elena M BrozosComplexo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Galicia, Spain.
Juan De la CámaraComplexo Hospitalario Universitario de Ferrol, Ferrol, Galicia, Spain.
José C Méndez MéndezSanatorio Nosa Señora dos Ollos Grandes, Lugo, Galicia, Spain.
Mónica Jorge-FernándezHospital Universitario Álvaro Cunqueiro, Vigo, Pontevedra, Spain.
Antía Cousillas CastiñeirasComplexo Hospitalario Universitario de Pontevedra, Pontevedra, Spain.
Cristina ReboredoMedical Oncology Department, University Hospital A Coruña, Xubias de Arriba, 84, 15006, A Coruña, Galicia, Spain.
David Arias RonComplexo Hospitalario Universitario de Ourense, Ourense, Galicia, Spain.
María L Pellón AugustoComplexo Hospitalario Universitario de Ferrol, Ferrol, Galicia, Spain.
Paula González VillarroelHospital Universitario Álvaro Cunqueiro, Vigo, Pontevedra, Spain.
Begoña GrañaMedical Oncology Department, University Hospital A Coruña, Xubias de Arriba, 84, 15006, A Coruña, Galicia, Spain.
Mercedes Salgado FernándezComplexo Hospitalario Universitario de Ourense, Ourense, Galicia, Spain.
Alberto Carral MasedaHospital Universitario Lucus Augusti, Lugo, Galicia, Spain.
Francisca Vázquez RiveraComplexo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Galicia, Spain.
Sonia Candamio FolgarComplexo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Galicia, Spain.
Margarita Reboredo LópezMedical Oncology Department, University Hospital A Coruña, Xubias de Arriba, 84, 15006, A Coruña, Galicia, Spain.
Galician Research Group on Digestive Tumors (GITuD)
Complexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña · ESUniversidade da Coruña · ESComplejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago · ESHospital Universitario Lucus Augusti · ESUniversity Hospital Complex Of Vigo · ES

Funding

GITuD medical writing assistance
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOutcomes are poorer in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients with BRAF V600E mutations than those without it, but the effect of these mutations on treatment response is unclear. This real-world study assessed the effects of antiangiogenic-based treatment and systemic inflammatory factors on outcomes in patients with BRAF V600-mutated mCRC.

methodsThis real-world, multicenter, retrospective, observational study included patients with BRAF V600-mutated mCRC treated in eight hospitals in Spain. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS); overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were also assessed. The effect of first- and second-line treatment type on OS, PFS, ORR, and DCR were evaluated, plus the impact of systemic inflammatory markers on these outcomes. A systemic inflammation score (SIS) of 1-3 was assigned based on one point each for platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) ≥200, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) ≥3, and serum albumin < 3.6 g/dL.

resultsOf 72 patients, data from 64 were analyzed. After a median of 69.1 months, median OS was 11.9 months and median first-line PFS was 4.4 months. First-line treatment was triplet chemotherapy-antiangiogenic (12.5%), doublet chemotherapy-antiangiogenic (47.2%), doublet chemotherapy-anti-EGFR (11.1%), or doublet chemotherapy (18.1%). Although first-line treatment showed no significant effect on OS, antiangiogenic-based regimens were associated with prolonged median PFS versus non-antiangiogenic regimens. Negative predictors of survival with antiangiogenic-based treatment were NLR, serum albumin, and SIS 1-3, but not PLR. Patients with SIS 1-3 showed significantly prolonged PFS with antiangiogenic-based treatment versus non-antiangiogenic-based treatment, while those with SIS=0 showed no PFS benefit.

conclusionsAntiangiogenic-based regimens, SIS, NLR, and albumin were predictors of survival in patients with mCRC, while SIS, NLR and serum albumin may predict response to antiangiogenic-based chemotherapy.

trial registrationGIT-BRAF-2017-01.

Indexed as

MutationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAngiogenesis InhibitorsBiomarkers, TumorBlood PlateletsColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInflammationLymphocytesMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisAngiogenesis InhibitorsBiomarkers, TumorBRAF protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafAntiangiogenic-based chemotherapyBRAF V600E mutationsMetastatic colorectal cancerSystemic inflammation score

Identifiers

PMID33446148
PMCPMC7807898
OpenAlexW3122029232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.