Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33446094›Full record

Observational studyBMC microbiology2021

Comparison of rectal swab, glove tip, and participant-collected stool techniques for gut microbiome sampling.

Meghan I Short, Robert Hudson, Benjamin D Besasie, Kelly R Reveles, Dimpy P Shah, Susannah Nicholson, Teresa L Johnson-Pais, Korri Weldon, Zhao Lai, Robin J Leach and 2 more

Abstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effects of High-Fat Diet on Intestinal Microbiota in Largemouth Bass (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Omnigene-GutAMB Express · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Meghan I ShortUniversity of Texas Health San Antonio, Glenn Biggs Institute for Alzheimer's and Neurodegenerative Diseases, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Robert HudsonDepartment of Urology, University of Texas Health San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA.
Benjamin D BesasieDepartment of Urology, University of Texas Health San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA.
Kelly R RevelesThe University of Texas at Austin, College of Pharmacy, Austin, TX, USA.
Dimpy P ShahDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Susannah NicholsonDepartment of Surgery, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Teresa L Johnson-PaisDepartment of Urology, University of Texas Health San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA.
Korri WeldonUniversity of Texas Health San Antonio, Genome Sequencing Facility, Greehey Children's Cancer Research Institute (GCCRI), San Antonio, TX, USA.
Zhao LaiUniversity of Texas Health San Antonio, Genome Sequencing Facility, Greehey Children's Cancer Research Institute (GCCRI), San Antonio, TX, USA.
Robin J LeachDepartment of Urology, University of Texas Health San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA.
Bernard FongangUniversity of Texas Health San Antonio, Glenn Biggs Institute for Alzheimer's and Neurodegenerative Diseases, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Michael A LissDepartment of Urology, University of Texas Health San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA. liss@uthscsa.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6978-1026

Funding

TISSUE CULTURE---COREP30CA054174 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI Lei Zheng · 1991 to 2026
$59.1M
SAN ANTONIO CENTER OF BIOMARKERS OF RISK FOR PROSTATE CAU01CA086402 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI LEACH, ROBIN JEAN, THOMPSON, IAN M. · 2000 to 2018
$33.1M
South Texas Alzheimer's Disease Research CenterP30AG066546 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI Sudha Seshadri · 2021 to 2026
$24.0M
San Antonio OAIC - Research Education Component (REC)P30AG044271 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI Adam Salmon, Elena Volpi · 2015 to 2026
$14.1M
Rio Grande Valley Alzheimer's Resource Center for Minority Aging Research: Partnerships for ProgressP30AG059305 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS RIO GRANDE VALLEY · PI Gladys E. Maestre · 2018 to 2026
$5.8M
Sulfatide deficiency: A novel mechanism leading to reactive astrogliosis in aging and Alzheimer’s diseaseRF1AG061729 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI HAN, XIANLIN · 2021 to 2021
$1.9M
ADSP Follow-up in Multi-Ethnic Cohorts via Endophenotypes, Omics & Model SystemsU01AG052409 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI FORNAGE, MYRIAM, SESHADRI, SUDHA · 2016 to 2020
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA054174NCI NIH HHS U01 CA086402NIA NIH HHS P30 AG044271NIA NIH HHS P30 AG059305NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066546NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG061729NIA NIH HHS U01 AG052409NIH HHS P30 CA054174NIH HHS U01 CA086402
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStudies of the gut microbiome are becoming increasingly important. Such studies require stool collections that can be processed or frozen in a timely manner so as not to alter the microbial content. Due to the logistical difficulties of home-based stool collection, there has been a challenge in selecting the appropriate sample collection technique and comparing results from different microbiome studies. Thus, we compared stool collection and two alternative clinic-based fecal microbiome collection techniques, including a newer glove-based collection method.

resultsWe prospectively enrolled 22 adult men from our prostate cancer screening cohort SABOR (San Antonio Biomarkers of Risk for prostate cancer) in San Antonio, TX, from 8/2018 to 4/2019. A rectal swab and glove tip sample were collected from each participant during a one-time visit to our clinics. A single stool sample was collected at the participant's home. DNA was isolated from the fecal material and 16 s rRNA sequencing of the V1-V2 and V3-V4 regions was performed. We found the gut microbiome to be similar in richness and evenness, noting no differences in alpha diversity among the collection methods. The stool collection method, which remains the gold-standard method for the gut microbiome, proved to have different community composition compared to swab and glove tip techniques (p< 0.001) as measured by Bray-Curtis and unifrac distances. There were no significant differences in between the swab and glove tip samples with regard to beta diversity (p> 0.05). Despite differences between home-based stool and office-based fecal collection methods, we noted that the distance metrics for the three methods cluster by participant indicating within-person similarities. Additionally, no taxa differed among the methods in a Linear Discriminant Analysis Effect Size (LEfSe) analysis comparing all-against-all sampling methods.

conclusionThe glove tip method provides similar gut microbiome results as rectal swab and stool microbiome collection techniques. The addition of a new office-based collection technique could help easy and practical implementation of gut microbiome research studies and clinical practice.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overBacteriaDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalFecesGastrointestinal MicrobiomeGloves, SurgicalHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPhylogenyProspective StudiesRectumRNA, Ribosomal, 16SDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16 s rRNA gene sequencingDigital rectal examinationGut microbiomeRectal swabsStool collection

Identifiers

PMID33446094
PMCPMC7809826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.