Observational studyBMC microbiology2021
Comparison of rectal swab, glove tip, and participant-collected stool techniques for gut microbiome sampling.
Observational study in BMC microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Difference analysis of intestinal microbiota in patients in the intensive care unit using different sampling methods: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Pooled it
- Effects of High-Fat Diet on Intestinal Microbiota in Largemouth Bass (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Gut Microbiome as a Lifestyle Risk Factor Associated with Prostate Cancer.European urology focus · 2026Article
- Impact of co-amoxiclav versus amoxicillin on the gastrointestinal microbiota in sub-Saharan children hospitalized with pneumonia.npj antimicrobials and resistance · 2026Article
- Transperineal drainage of male rectovesical pouch abscess under ultrasound guidance using a biplane endocavitary probe.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Stool and vaginal microbiome profiles patterns among Black and White endometrial cancer survivors: A pilot study in North Carolina.PloS one · 2026Article
- Colibactin Exerts Androgen-dependent and -independent Effects on Prostate Cancer.European urology oncology · 2025Article
- Distribution of gut microbiota across intestinal segments and their impact on human physiological and pathological processes.Cell & bioscience · 2025Review
- The healthy human gut can take it all: vancomycin-variable, linezolid-resistant strains and specific bacteriocin-species interplay inApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025Article
- Using short-read 16S rRNA sequencing of multiple variable regions to generate high-quality results to a species level.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Article
- Sampling strategies for digestive system flora studies: current research and perspectives.PeerJ · 2025Review
- A bi-variate framework to model microbiome resilience in healthy dogs.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- Omnigene-GutAMB Express · 2024Article
- Phase 1 clinical trial evaluating safety, bioavailability, and gut microbiome with a combination of curcumin and ursolic acid in lipid enhanced capsules.Journal of traditional and complementary medicine · 2024Article
- Current Trends and Challenges of Microbiome Research in Prostate Cancer.Current oncology reports · 2024Review
- Impact of antibiotic prophylaxis on gut microbiota in colorectal surgery: insights from an Eastern European stewardship study.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024Article
- The potential role of the microbiota in prostate cancer pathogenesis and treatment.Nature reviews. Urology · 2023Review
- Analytical factors for eight short-chain fatty acid analyses in mouse feces through headspace solid-phase microextraction-triple quadrupole gas chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2023Article
- Bifidobacteria define gut microbiome profiles of golden lion tamarin (Leontopithecus rosalia) and marmoset (Callithrix sp.) metagenomic shotgun pools.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundStudies of the gut microbiome are becoming increasingly important. Such studies require stool collections that can be processed or frozen in a timely manner so as not to alter the microbial content. Due to the logistical difficulties of home-based stool collection, there has been a challenge in selecting the appropriate sample collection technique and comparing results from different microbiome studies. Thus, we compared stool collection and two alternative clinic-based fecal microbiome collection techniques, including a newer glove-based collection method.
resultsWe prospectively enrolled 22 adult men from our prostate cancer screening cohort SABOR (San Antonio Biomarkers of Risk for prostate cancer) in San Antonio, TX, from 8/2018 to 4/2019. A rectal swab and glove tip sample were collected from each participant during a one-time visit to our clinics. A single stool sample was collected at the participant's home. DNA was isolated from the fecal material and 16 s rRNA sequencing of the V1-V2 and V3-V4 regions was performed. We found the gut microbiome to be similar in richness and evenness, noting no differences in alpha diversity among the collection methods. The stool collection method, which remains the gold-standard method for the gut microbiome, proved to have different community composition compared to swab and glove tip techniques (p< 0.001) as measured by Bray-Curtis and unifrac distances. There were no significant differences in between the swab and glove tip samples with regard to beta diversity (p> 0.05). Despite differences between home-based stool and office-based fecal collection methods, we noted that the distance metrics for the three methods cluster by participant indicating within-person similarities. Additionally, no taxa differed among the methods in a Linear Discriminant Analysis Effect Size (LEfSe) analysis comparing all-against-all sampling methods.
conclusionThe glove tip method provides similar gut microbiome results as rectal swab and stool microbiome collection techniques. The addition of a new office-based collection technique could help easy and practical implementation of gut microbiome research studies and clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.