Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33446093›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2021

Reablement through time and space: a scoping review of how the concept of 'reablement' for older people has been defined and operationalised.

Amy Clotworthy, Sasmita Kusumastuti, Rudi G J Westendorp

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Mapping of Reablement Research - A Scoping Review of Reviews.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Defining Reablement in the Dutch Context: A Modified Delphi Study.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Publication Trends in Reablement - A Scoping Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Amy Clotworthy *Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Bartholinsgade 6Q, 1014, Copenhagen K, Denmark. amy@sund.ku.dk.
Sasmita Kusumastuti *Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Bartholinsgade 6Q, 1014, Copenhagen K, Denmark.
Rudi G J WestendorpDepartment of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Bartholinsgade 6Q, 1014, Copenhagen K, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile the field of rehabilitation has determined a common definition of professional practice, legislators and healthcare professionals in various Western countries have struggled to reach consensus about how the newer offer of 'reablement' should be organised, operationalised, and understood as a health service for older adults. International research indicates that there is confusion, ambiguity, and disagreement about the terminology and the structure of these programmes, and they may not be adequately supporting older people's self-identified goals. Could an analysis of the concept's genealogy illuminate how reablement can be more effective and beneficial in theory and in practice?

methodsWe conducted a qualitative and quantitative scoping review to determine how reablement has developed through time and space. Eligible articles (N=86) had to focus on any of the defined features of current reablement programmes; there were no restrictions on study designs or publication dates. In articles published from 1947 to 2019, we identified themes and patterns, commonalities, and differences in how various countries described and defined reablement. We also performed an analysis using computer software to construct and visualise term maps based on significant words extracted from the article abstracts.

resultsThe fundamental principles of reablement have a long history. However, these programmes have undergone a widespread expansion since the mid-2000s with an intention to reduce costs related to providing long-term care services and in-home assistance to growing older populations. Despite theoretical aspirations to offer person-centred and goal-directed reablement, few countries have been able to implement programmes that adequately promote older people's goals, social involvement, or participation in their local community in a safe, culturally sensitive and adaptable way.

conclusionsReablement is meant to support older people in attaining their self-defined goals to be both more physically independent at home and socially involved in their communities. However, until legislators, health professionals, and older people can collectively reach consensus about how person-centred reablement can be more effectively implemented and supported in professional home-care practice, it will be difficult to determine a conceptual description of reablement as a service that is unique, separate, and distinct from standard rehabilitation.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingHome Care ServicesAgedAged, 80 and overHealth PersonnelHumansMotivationActivities of daily livingAgeingHealth servicesHomecareLiterature reviewReablementRehabilitationRestorative care

Identifiers

PMID33446093
PMCPMC7809765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.