Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33445773›Full record

ArticlePolymers2021

The Quantitative Nanomechanical Mapping of Starch/Kaolin Film Surfaces by Peak Force AFM.

Anita Kwaśniewska, Michał Świetlicki, Adam Prószyński, Grzegorz Gładyszewski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anita KwaśniewskaDepartment of Applied Physics, Lublin University of Technology, 20-618 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4792-6260
Michał ŚwietlickiDepartment of Applied Physics, Lublin University of Technology, 20-618 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-3625-542X
Adam PrószyńskiDepartment of Applied Physics, Lublin University of Technology, 20-618 Lublin, Poland.
Grzegorz GładyszewskiDepartment of Applied Physics, Lublin University of Technology, 20-618 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6328-8721
Lublin University of Technology · PL

Funding

Ministerstwo Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego 030/RID/2018/19
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Starch films modified with additives are materials increasingly being used in the production of packaging. These types of biopolymers can, to a considerable degree, replace plastic, contributing to the reduction in both production and waste management costs. However, they should be characterised by specific mechanical and surface parameters which determine their application. In the presented work, the PeakForce Quantitative Nanomechanics Mapping (PFQNM) method was applied to analyse a starch-based biopolymer modified with two different kaolin clay contents (5% and 10%). The technique used facilitates the assessment of the correlation of Atomic Force Microscope AFM height parameters with nanomechanical ones which provide the definitions of mutual interactions and allow the possibility to analyse materials in respect of various details. The investigated material was mapped in the Derjaguin-Muller-Toporov (DMT) modulus, adhesion and height domains. The results obtained indicated the impact of additives on the determined parameters. Increases in the DMT modulus and the adhesion force, along with the kaolin content, were observed. The enhancement of starch films with kaolin clay also induced growth in the surface roughness parameters.

Indexed as

adhesion forceAFM PeakForce QNMbiopolymersnanomechanicsstarch composite film

Identifiers

PMID33445773
PMCPMC7828257
OpenAlexW3120080429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.