Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33445750›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Readiness and Willingness to Provide Immunization Services after Pilot Vaccination Training: A Survey among Community Pharmacists Trained and Not Trained in Immunization during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Poland.

Piotr Merks, Urszula Religioni, Krzysztof Bilmin, Jedrzej Lewicki, Marta Jakubowska, Anna Waksmundzka-Walczuk, Aleksandra Czerw, Agnieszka Barańska, Joanna Bogusz, Katarzyna Plagens-Rotman and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 10 institutions in 3 countries.

Piotr MerksFaculty of Medicine, Collegium Medicum, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University, 01-938 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8966-3799
Urszula ReligioniCollegium of Business Administration, Warsaw School of Economics, 02-513 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1434-2138
Krzysztof BilminFaculty of Medicine, Collegium Medicum, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University, 01-938 Warsaw, Poland.
Jedrzej LewickiPolish Pharmaceutical Group, 91-342 Łódź, Poland.
Marta JakubowskaPolish Pharmaceutical Group, 91-342 Łódź, Poland.
Anna Waksmundzka-WalczukSolec Hospital, 00-382 Warsaw, Poland.
Aleksandra CzerwDepartment of Economics and Medical Law, Medical University of Warsaw, 00-791 Warsaw, Poland.
Agnieszka BarańskaDepartment of Computer Science and Medical Statistics with the Studio of Remote Learning, Medical University of Lublin, 20-954 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4864-0184
Joanna BoguszDepartment of Epidemiology, National Institute of Public Health-National Institute of Hygiene, 00-791 Warsaw, Poland.
Katarzyna Plagens-RotmanHipolit Cegielski State University of Applied Sciences, 62-200 Gniezno, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7646-7430
Dariusz ŚwietlikDepartment of Biostatistics and Neural Networks, Medical University of Gdansk, Debinki 1, 80-211 Gdansk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9127-7368
Ewelina DrelichDepartment of Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Collegium, Medicum in Bydgoszcz, 85-089 Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Damian ŚwieczkowskiFirst Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Gdansk, Debinki 7, 80-211 Gdansk, Poland.
Jane LambertEmergency Care Gateway (ECG), Milton Keynes MK13 9AP, UK.
Miłosz JaguszewskiPolish Pharmaceutical Group, 91-342 Łódź, Poland.
Grzegorz JuszczykDepartment of Public Health, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland.
Bander BalkhiMedication Safety Research Chair, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh 4545, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-3801-5497
Regis VaillancourtChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L1, Canada.
Gdańsk Medical University · PLCollegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz · PLMedical University of Warsaw · PLCardinal Stefan Wyszynski University in Warsaw · PLChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario · CAHipolit Cegielski State University of Applied Sciences in Gniezno · PLKing Saud University · SAMedical University of Lublin · PLNarodowy Instytut Zdrowia Publicznego PZH – Państwowy Instytut Badawczy · PLSGH Warsaw School of Economics · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImmunization rates among the adult population in Poland are below desired targets, urging the need to expand this service in the community. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the ultimate goals for limiting the spread of the infection are vaccines against SARS-CoV-2. Pharmaceutical companies are in a race for the fastest possible way to deliver vaccines. Community pharmacists in Poland are recognised as an accessible yet underutilised group of medical professionals. Therefore, involving pharmacists in vaccinations may have beneficial results for the healthcare system.

objectivesThe objectives of this study were to assess the readiness and willingness of community pharmacists following the Pharmacist Without Borders project who had either been trained or not in providing immunization services, and to identify the factors that may support the implementation of such services in Poland.

methodsThis study was conducted among pharmacists between February and August 2020 in Poland. A survey was developed to determine their readiness to provide vaccination services in their pharmacies, to recognise any barriers to vaccinations, as well as the factors necessary to implement vaccination services in Polish pharmacies.

resultsA total of 1777 pharmacists participated in the study, comprising 127 (7.1%) pharmacists trained in vaccinations during the Pharmacists Without Borders project and 1650 (92.9%) pharmacists not participating in the workshops. Pharmacists participating in the workshops more often indicated that providing vaccinations in community pharmacies would improve the overall vaccination rate (

conclusionThe pharmacists working in community pharmacies indicated many advantages of vaccinations in pharmacies. This study identified barriers to the introduction of vaccinations and factors necessary to implement these services in pharmacies. The pharmacists trained during the immunization programme of the Pharmacists Without Borders project showed a greater readiness to provide immunization services.

Indexed as

COVID-19AdultCommunity Pharmacy ServicesHumansImmunizationImmunization ProgramsPandemicsPharmacistsPolandProfessional RoleSARS-CoV-2Vaccinationcommunity pharmacistsimmunization servicesPharmacist Without Borders projectPolandvaccines

Identifiers

PMID33445750
PMCPMC7828205
OpenAlexW3118298847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.