Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33445623›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2021

The Current State of Knowledge on the Clinical and Methodological Aspects of Extracorporeal Shock Waves Therapy in the Management of Post-Stroke Spasticity-Overview of 20 Years of Experiences.

Józef Opara, Jakub Taradaj, Karolina Walewicz, Joanna Rosińczuk, Robert Dymarek

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06311526 (Mechanism of Action of Focal Extracorporeal Shock Waves as a Treatment of Upper Limb Stroke Spasticity), which is not on this map. Cited by 29 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06311526 completednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Mechanism of Action of Focal Extracorporeal Shock Waves as a Treatment of Upper Limb Stroke Spasticity: a Pilot Study

TypeobservationalSponsorIstituto Auxologico ItalianoRan2023 to 2025Enrolled12ConditionsStroke, Hemiparesis, Hemiplegia, Spasticity as Sequela of StrokeArmsExtracorporeal Shockwave Therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Efficacy of Focused Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in Chronic Low Back Pain: A Prospective Randomized 3-Month Follow-Up Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2022
    Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Józef OparaDepartment of Clinical Rehabilitation, Academy of Physical Education in Katowice, 40-065 Katowice, Poland.
Jakub TaradajInstitute of Physiotherapy and Health Sciences, Academy of Physical Education in Katowice, 40-065 Katowice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1796-5832
Karolina WalewiczInstitute of Health Sciences, University of Opole, 45-060 Opole, Poland.
Joanna RosińczukDepartment of Nervous System Diseases, Faculty of Health Sciences, Wroclaw Medical University, 51-618 Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7359-2287
Robert DymarekDepartment of Nervous System Diseases, Faculty of Health Sciences, Wroclaw Medical University, 51-618 Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2806-1775
Academy of Fine Arts in Katowice · PLWroclaw Medical University · PLUniversity of Opole · PL

Funding

Ministry of Health of the Republic of Poland STM.E020.20.100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In many patients after stroke, spasticity develops over time, resulting in a decrease in the patient's independence, pain, worsening mood, and, consequently, lower quality of life. In the last ten years, a rich arsenal of physical agents to reduce muscle tone such as extracorporeal shock therapy (ESWT) wave has come through. The aim of this narrative review article is to present the current state of knowledge on the use of ESWT as a supplement to the comprehensive rehabilitation of people after stroke suffering from spasticity. The PubMed and PEDro databases were searched for papers published in English from January 2000 to December 2020, 22 of which met inclusion criteria for clinical studies related to post-stroke spasticity management with ESWT. A total of 22 studies including 468 post-stroke patients-11 reports with the upper limb (267 patients) and 10 reports within the lower limb (201 patients), as well as one report including both upper and lower limb. We focused our attention on clinical and methodological aspects. Therefore, we performed the assessment of enrolled studies in terms of methodological quality using the PEDro and level of evidence using the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines. Furthermore, we indicated implications for clinical practice in using ESWT for post-stroke spasticity management. Moreover, we discussed a suggestion for future research directions. In conclusion, an ESWT effectively reduces muscle tone in people with spastic limb after stroke. Further, ESWT is safe and free of undesirable side effects. The mechanism of action of ESWT on muscles affected by spasticity is still unknown. To date, no standard parameters of ESWT in post-stroke spasticity regarding intensity, frequency, location, and the number of sessions has been established. Further research, meeting the highest standards, is needed to establish uniform muscle stimulation parameters using ESWT.

Indexed as

muscle spasticitynarrative reviewneurorehabilitationphysiotherapyshock wave therapystate of artstroke

Identifiers

PMID33445623
PMCPMC7826726
OpenAlexW3120953610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.