Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33445604›Full record

ArticlePathogens (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Psychophysical Evaluation of the Olfactory Function: European Multicenter Study on 774 COVID-19 Patients.

Luigi Angelo Vaira, Jerome R Lechien, Mohamad Khalife, Marzia Petrocelli, Stephane Hans, Lea Distinguin, Giovanni Salzano, Marco Cucurullo, Piero Doneddu, Francesco Antonio Salzano and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06498687 (A Single-Arm Study to Evaluate the Feasibility of CYR-064 Theophylline Nasal Spray for the Treatment of Parkinson's Disease Related Hyposmia and Anosmia), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06498687 phase1withdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

A Single-Arm Study to Evaluate the Feasibility of CYR-064 Theophylline Nasal Spray for the Treatment of Parkinson's Disease Related Hyposmia and Anosmia

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of NebraskaRan2025 to 2026Enrolled0ConditionsHyposmia, AnosmiaArmsCYR-064
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Comparison of prevalence and evolution of COVID-19 olfactory disorders in patients infected by D614 (wild) and B.1.1.7. Alpha variant: a brief report.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Results from psychophysical tests of smell and taste during the course of SARS-CoV-2 infection: a review.Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale · 2022
    Review
  14. Correlations between IL-6 serum level and olfactory dysfunction severity in COVID-19 patients: a preliminary study.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Luigi Angelo VairaCOVID-19 Task Force of the Young-Otolaryngologists of the International Federations of Oto-rhino-laryngological Societies (YO-IFOS), F92150 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7789-145X
Jerome R LechienCOVID-19 Task Force of the Young-Otolaryngologists of the International Federations of Oto-rhino-laryngological Societies (YO-IFOS), F92150 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0845-0845
Mohamad KhalifeCOVID-19 Task Force of the Young-Otolaryngologists of the International Federations of Oto-rhino-laryngological Societies (YO-IFOS), F92150 Paris, France.
Marzia PetrocelliMaxillofacial Surgery Operative Unit, Bellaria and Maggiore Hospital, 40100 Bologna, Italy.
Stephane HansCOVID-19 Task Force of the Young-Otolaryngologists of the International Federations of Oto-rhino-laryngological Societies (YO-IFOS), F92150 Paris, France.
Lea DistinguinCOVID-19 Task Force of the Young-Otolaryngologists of the International Federations of Oto-rhino-laryngological Societies (YO-IFOS), F92150 Paris, France.
Giovanni SalzanoMaxillofacial Surgery Operative Unit, University Hospital of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy.
Marco CucurulloMaxillofacial Surgery Department, San Paolo Hospital, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, University of Milan, 20142 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8110-559X
Piero DonedduMaxillofacial Surgery Operative Unit, University Hospital of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5657-3025
Francesco Antonio SalzanoOtorhinolaryngology Operative Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, "Scuola Medica Salernitana", University of Salerno, 84081 Baronissi (Salerno), Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4090-8120
Federico BiglioliMaxillofacial Surgery Department, San Paolo Hospital, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, University of Milan, 20142 Milan, Italy.
Fabrice JourneDepartment of Human and Experimental Oncology, Faculty of Medicine UMONS Research Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, University of Mons (UMons), B7000 Mons, Belgium.
Andrea Fausto PianaBiomedical Science Department, PhD School of Biomedical Science, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6609-8886
Giacomo De RiuCOVID-19 Task Force of the Young-Otolaryngologists of the International Federations of Oto-rhino-laryngological Societies (YO-IFOS), F92150 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7201-6445
Sven SaussezCOVID-19 Task Force of the Young-Otolaryngologists of the International Federations of Oto-rhino-laryngological Societies (YO-IFOS), F92150 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3655-1854

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe objective evaluation of the olfactory function of coronavirus disease 2019 patients is difficult because of logistical and operator-safety problems. For this reason, in the literature, the data obtained from psychophysical tests are few and based on small case series.

methodsA multicenter, cohort study conducted in seven European hospitals between March 22 and August 20, 2020. The Sniffin-Sticks test and the Connecticut Chemosensory Clinical Research Center orthonasal olfaction test were used to objectively evaluate the olfactory function.

resultsThis study included 774 patients, of these 481 (62.1%) presented olfactory dysfunction (OD): 280 were hyposmic and 201 were anosmic. There was a significant difference between self-reported anosmia/hyposmia and psychophysical test results (

conclusionsPsychophysical assessment represents a significantly more accurate assessment tool for olfactory function than patient self-reported clinical outcomes. Olfactory disturbances appear to be largely independent from the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of the patients. The non-association with rhinitis symptoms and the high prevalence as a presenting symptom make olfactory disturbances an important symptom in the differential diagnosis between COVID-19 and common flu.

Indexed as

anosmiaCOVID-19hyposmiaolfactionolfactory dysfunctionparosmiaSARS-CoV-2smell

Identifiers

PMID33445604
PMCPMC7827350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.