Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33445601›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Elbow Motion Trajectory Prediction Using a Multi-Modal Wearable System: A Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Techniques.

Kieran Little, Bobby K Pappachan, Sibo Yang, Bernardo Noronha, Domenico Campolo, Dino Accoto

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kieran LittleRobotics Research Centre, School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798, Singapore.
Bobby K PappachanRobotics Research Centre, School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-9551-5896
Sibo YangRobotics Research Centre, School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-3024-0630
Bernardo NoronhaRobotics Research Centre, School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-6665-0052
Domenico CampoloRobotics Research Centre, School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-6930-0413
Dino AccotoRobotics Research Centre, School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-9039-5488

Funding

A*STAR,Singapore SERC1922500046
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motion intention detection is fundamental in the implementation of human-machine interfaces applied to assistive robots. In this paper, multiple machine learning techniques have been explored for creating upper limb motion prediction models, which generally depend on three factors: the signals collected from the user (such as kinematic or physiological), the extracted features and the selected algorithm. We explore the use of different features extracted from various signals when used to train multiple algorithms for the prediction of elbow flexion angle trajectories. The accuracy of the prediction was evaluated based on the mean velocity and peak amplitude of the trajectory, which are sufficient to fully define it. Results show that prediction accuracy when using solely physiological signals is low, however, when kinematic signals are included, it is largely improved. This suggests kinematic signals provide a reliable source of information for predicting elbow trajectories. Different models were trained using 10 algorithms. Regularization algorithms performed well in all conditions, whereas neural networks performed better when the most important features are selected. The extensive analysis provided in this study can be consulted to aid in the development of accurate upper limb motion intention detection models.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMachine LearningWearable Electronic DevicesAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaElbowElectromyographyFemaleHumansMaleRange of Motion, ArticularSignal Processing, Computer-Assistedassistive roboticshuman-machine interfacemachine learningmotion intention detectionrehabilitation robotics

Identifiers

PMID33445601
PMCPMC7827251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.