Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33445555›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

Application of Genome Editing in Tomato Breeding: Mechanisms, Advances, and Prospects.

Hymavathi Salava, Sravankumar Thula, Vijee Mohan, Rahul Kumar, Fatemeh Maghuly

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Precision Genome Editing with CRISPR-Cas9.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Advances and Prospects of Virus-Resistant Breeding in Tomatoes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Biotechnological Advances to Improve Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Crops.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Functional Genomics for Plant Breeding.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Hymavathi SalavaDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad 500064, India.
Sravankumar ThulaMendel Centre for Plant Genomics and Proteomics, Central European Institute of Technology (CEITEC), Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, CZ-625 00 Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-6925-6950
Vijee MohanDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of North Texas, Denton, TX 76203, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6472-0187
Rahul KumarPlant Translational Research Laboratory, Department of Plant Sciences, University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad 500064, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4298-5130
Fatemeh MaghulyPlant Functional Genomics, Institute of Molecular Biotechnology, Department of Biotechnology, BOKU-VIBT, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, 1190 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-5433-0070
University of Hyderabad · INCentral European Institute of Technology · CZInstitute of Molecular Biotechnology · ATUniversity of North Texas · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plants regularly face the changing climatic conditions that cause biotic and abiotic stress responses. The abiotic stresses are the primary constraints affecting crop yield and nutritional quality in many crop plants. The advances in genome sequencing and high-throughput approaches have enabled the researchers to use genome editing tools for the functional characterization of many genes useful for crop improvement. The present review focuses on the genome editing tools for improving many traits such as disease resistance, abiotic stress tolerance, yield, quality, and nutritional aspects of tomato. Many candidate genes conferring tolerance to abiotic stresses such as heat, cold, drought, and salinity stress have been successfully manipulated by gene modification and editing techniques such as RNA interference, insertional mutagenesis, and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR/Cas9). In this regard, the genome editing tools such as CRISPR/Cas9, which is a fast and efficient technology that can be exploited to explore the genetic resources for the improvement of tomato and other crop plants in terms of stress tolerance and nutritional quality. The review presents examples of gene editing responsible for conferring both biotic and abiotic stresses in tomato simultaneously. The literature on using this powerful technology to improve fruit quality, yield, and nutritional aspects in tomato is highlighted. Finally, the prospects and challenges of genome editing, public and political acceptance in tomato are discussed.

Indexed as

Gene EditingGenome, PlantGenomicsPlant BreedingCRISPR-Cas SystemsEpigenomicsGene Knockdown TechniquesMutagenesisOxidative StressPlants, Genetically ModifiedSolanum lycopersicumabiotic stressbiotic stressgene knockoutresistance breedingtrait improvement

Identifiers

PMID33445555
PMCPMC7827871
OpenAlexW3120460084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.