Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33444809›Full record

ArticleBrain stimulation

Transient ultrasound stimulation has lasting effects on neuronal excitability.

Benjamin Clennell, Tom G J Steward, Meg Elley, Eunju Shin, Miles Weston, Bruce W Drinkwater, Daniel J Whitcomb

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain stimulation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Activating membrane receptors with ultrasound.Nature biomedical engineering · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Benjamin ClennellBristol Medical School, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS1 3NY, UK.
Tom G J StewardBristol Medical School, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS1 3NY, UK.
Meg ElleyBristol Medical School, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS1 3NY, UK.
Eunju ShinNeuroscience and Mental Health Research Institute, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF24 4HQ, UK.
Miles WestonTWI Technology Centre, Port Talbot, SA13 1SB, UK.
Bruce W DrinkwaterFaculty of Engineering, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TR, UK.
Daniel J WhitcombBristol Medical School, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS1 3NY, UK. Electronic address: d.j.whitcomb@bristol.ac.uk.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L014181/1Medical Research Council MR/N0137941/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTranscranial ultrasound stimulation can acutely modulate brain activity, but the lasting effects on neurons are unknown.

objectiveTo assess the excitability profile of neurons in the hours following transient ultrasound stimulation.

methodsPrimary rat cortical neurons were stimulated with a 40 s, 200 kHz pulsed ultrasound stimulation or sham-stimulation. Intrinsic firing properties were investigated through whole-cell patch-clamp recording by evoking action potentials in response to somatic current injection. Recordings were taken at set timepoints following ultrasound stimulation: 0-2 h, 6-8 h, 12-14 h and 24-26 h. Transmission electron microscopy was used to assess synaptic ultrastructure at the same timepoints.

resultsIn the 0-2 h window, neurons stimulated with ultrasound displayed an increase in the mean frequency of evoked action potentials of 32% above control cell levels (p = 0.023). After 4-6 h this increase was measured as 44% (p = 0.0043). By 12-14 h this effect was eliminated and remained absent 24-26 h post-stimulation. These changes to action potential firing occurred in conjunction with statistically significant differences between control and ultrasound-stimulated neurons in action potential half-width, depolarisation rate, and repolarisation rate, that were similarly eliminated by 24 h following stimulation. These effects occurred in the absence of alterations to intrinsic membrane properties or synaptic ultrastructure.

conclusionWe report that stimulating neurons with 40 s of ultrasound enhances their excitability for up to 8 h in conjunction with modifications to action potential kinetics. This occurs in the absence of major ultrastructural change or modification of intrinsic membrane properties. These results can inform the application of transcranial ultrasound in experimental and therapeutic settings.

Indexed as

AxonsNeuronsAction PotentialsAnimalsElectric StimulationMalePatch-Clamp TechniquesRatsRats, WistarElectron microscopyIntrinsic excitabilityNeuromodulationPrimary neuronUltrasound stimulationWhole-cell patch clamp

Identifiers

PMID33444809
PMCPMC7973721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.