Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33444735›Full record

ArticleMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP2021

Plasma Proteomes Can Be Reidentifiable and Potentially Contain Personally Sensitive and Incidental Findings.

Philipp E Geyer, Sebastian Porsdam Mann, Peter V Treit, Matthias Mann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The Impact of Acute Nutritional Interventions on the Plasma Proteome.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Identifying individuals using proteomics: are we there yet?Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Philipp E GeyerDepartment of Proteomics and Signal Transduction, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany; Faculty of Health Sciences, NNF Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; OmicEra Diagnostics GmbH, Planegg, Germany. Electronic address: geyer@biochem.mpg.de.
Sebastian Porsdam MannDepartment of Media, Cognition and Communication, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Uehiro Center for Practical Ethics, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.
Peter V TreitDepartment of Proteomics and Signal Transduction, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany.
Matthias MannDepartment of Proteomics and Signal Transduction, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany; Faculty of Health Sciences, NNF Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. Electronic address: mmann@biochem.mpg.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of clinical proteomics is to identify, quantify, and characterize proteins in body fluids or tissue to assist diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of patients. In this way, it is similar to more mature omics technologies, such as genomics, that are increasingly applied in biomedicine. We argue that, similar to those fields, proteomics also faces ethical issues related to the kinds of information that is inherently obtained through sample measurement, although their acquisition was not the primary purpose. Specifically, we demonstrate the potential to identify individuals both by their characteristic, individual-specific protein levels and by variant peptides reporting on coding single nucleotide polymorphisms. Furthermore, it is in the nature of blood plasma proteomics profiling that it broadly reports on the health status of an individual-beyond the disease under investigation. Finally, we show that private and potentially sensitive information, such as ethnicity and pregnancy status, can increasingly be derived from proteomics data. Although this is potentially valuable not only to the individual, but also for biomedical research, it raises ethical questions similar to the incidental findings obtained through other omics technologies. We here introduce the necessity of-and argue for the desirability for-ethical and human-rights-related issues to be discussed within the proteomics community. Those thoughts are more fully developed in our accompanying manuscript. Appreciation and discussion of ethical aspects of proteomic research will allow for deeper, better-informed, more diverse, and, most importantly, wiser guidelines for clinical proteomics.

Indexed as

Incidental FindingsPersonally Identifiable InformationBlood ProteinsFemaleHumansMaleProteomeProteomicsBlood ProteinsProteomeallelesbiomarker discoveryclinical proteomicsethics

Identifiers

PMID33444735
PMCPMC7950134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.