Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33444202›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2020

Preventable emergency admissions of older adults: an observational mixed-method study of rates, associative factors and underlying causes in two Dutch hospitals.

Steef van den Broek, Nikki Heiwegen, Margot Verhofstad, Reinier Akkermans, Liselore van Westerop, Yvonne Schoon, Gijs Hesselink

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05456906 (Avoidable Hospitalizations/ Emergency Department Visits- Meta-synthesis of Qualitative Research), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05456906 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Avoidable Hospitalizations/ Emergency Department Visits- Meta-synthesis of Qualitative Research

TypeobservationalSponsorKaohsiung Medical UniversityRan2022 to 2022Enrolled30ConditionsDiabetes, Heart Failure, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, AsthmaArmsNo intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Steef van den BroekEmergency Department, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, Netherlands s.vandenbroek@cwz.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-7775-4869
Nikki HeiwegenEmergency Department, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands.
Margot VerhofstadEmergency Department, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands.
Reinier AkkermansDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands.
Liselore van WesteropEmergency Department, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Yvonne SchoonEmergency Department, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8482-9048
Gijs HesselinkEmergency Department, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2532-0724

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveOlder adults are hospitalised from the emergency department (ED) without potentially needing hospital care. Knowledge about rates, associative factors and causes of these preventable emergency admissions (PEAs) is limited. This study aimed to determine the rates, associative factors and causes for PEAs of older adults.

designA mixed-method observational study.

settingThe EDs of two Dutch hospitals.

participants492 patients aged >70 years and hospitalised from the ED. MEASUREMENTS: Quantitative data were retrospectively extracted from the electronical medical record over a 1-month period. Admissions were classified (non)preventable based on a standardised approach. Univariate and multivariate multilevel logistic regression analyses were performed to identify possible associations between PEAs and demographic, clinical and care process factors. Qualitative data were prospectively collected by email and telephone interviews and analysed thematically to explore hospital physician's perceived causes for the identified PEAs.

resultsOf the 492 included cases, 86 (17.5%) were classified as PEA. Patients with a higher age (adjusted OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.08; p=0.04), a low urgency classification (adjusted OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.14 to 3.15; p=0.01), and attending the ED in the weekend (adjusted OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.22 to 3.37; p<0.01) were associated with an increased likelihood of a PEA. 49 physicians were interviewed by telephone and email. Perceived causes for PEAs were related to patient's attitudes (eg, postponement of medical care at home), provider's attitudes (eg, deciding for admission after family pressure), health system deficiencies (eg, limited access to community services during out-of-hours and delayed access to inpatient diagnostic resources) and poor communication between primary care and hospital professionals about patient treatment preferences.

conclusionsOur findings contribute to existing evidence that many emergency admissions of older adults are preventable, thereby indicating a possible source of unnecessary expensive, and potentially harmful, hospital care.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalHospitalizationAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHospitalsHumansMalePrimary Health CareRetrospective Studiesaccident & emergency medicinegeriatric medicinepreventive medicineprimary care

Identifiers

PMID33444202
PMCPMC7682455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.