Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33444192›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Active and passive work breaks during simulated laparoscopy among laparoscopic surgeons: study protocol for a controlled, randomised cross-over laboratory trial.

Tessy Luger, Monika A Rieger, Rosina Bonsch, Bernhard Krämer, Robert Seibt, Benjamin Steinhilber

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03715816 (Work Breaks During Minimally Invasive Surgery - Target-group Specific Development of Work Break Schedules), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03715816 nacompletednot on this map

Work Breaks During Minimally Invasive Surgery - Target-group Specific Development of Work Break Schedules

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital TuebingenRan2019 to 2020Enrolled21ConditionsWork-break SchedulesArmsWork break schedule
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tessy LugerInstitute of Occupational and Social Medicine and Health Services Research, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany tessy.luger@med.uni-tuebingen.de.ORCID 0000-0001-5718-251X
Monika A RiegerInstitute of Occupational and Social Medicine and Health Services Research, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Rosina BonschInstitute of Occupational and Social Medicine and Health Services Research, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Bernhard KrämerDepartment of Gynecology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Robert SeibtInstitute of Occupational and Social Medicine and Health Services Research, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Benjamin SteinhilberInstitute of Occupational and Social Medicine and Health Services Research, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
University Children's Hospital Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLaparoscopy has partially replaced open surgery due to the lower infection rate for the patient and hence better and shorter recovery. However, the surgeon's physical load is higher due to longer duration static and awkward body postures, increasing the risk for developing work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Interventions of an organisational nature are work breaks, being either passive or active. The primary objectives of this study are to determine whether passive and active work breaks lead to less discomfort than no work breaks and whether active work breaks lead to less discomfort than passive work breaks. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A controlled, randomised cross-over trial will be performed in the laboratory, of which its protocol is described here according to the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) 2013 Statement. Recruitment of 21 laparoscopic surgeons started in April 2019 and the study is ongoing. The participating surgeons will perform three 1.5 hour experimental conditions, one without work breaks, one with 2.5 min passive work breaks including rest, and one with 2.5 min active work breaks including mobility and stretching exercises. The work breaks will be taken after 30 and 60 min of work. During the experiments, outcomes will be recorded. The primary outcome is rating of perceived discomfort measured on an 11-point numeric rating scale. The secondary outcomes are performance, muscle activity of selected muscles, upper body angles, heart rate, workload and subjective evaluation of both interventions. The collected data will be tested using a one-way or two-factorial repeated-measures analysis of variance. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval of the study protocol was received by the local medical ethical committee of the University of Tübingen in February 2019 (no 618/2018BO2). The results of this study will be presented at national and international conferences, submitted for publications in peer-reviewed journals and serve as the starting point for a feasibility study. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03715816.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyCross-Over StudiesHumansLaboratoriesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSurgeonsminimally invasive surgeryoccupational & industrial medicinephysiologyprotocols & guidelinespublic health

Identifiers

PMID33444192
PMCPMC7678387
OpenAlexW3102245863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.