Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33444174›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2020

Studying Accompaniment model Feasibility and Effectiveness (SAFE) Study: study protocol for a prospective observational cohort study of the effectiveness of self-managed medication abortion.

Heidi Moseson, Brianna Keefe-Oates, Ruvani T Jayaweera, Sofia Filippa, Relebohile Motana, Chiara Bercu, Ijeoma Egwuatu, Belen Grosso, Ika Ayu Kristianingrum, Sybil Nmezi and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Heidi MosesonIbis Reproductive Health, Oakland, California, USA hmoseson@ibisreproductivehealth.org.ORCID 0000-0002-2488-2429
Brianna Keefe-OatesIbis Reproductive Health, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Ruvani T JayaweeraIbis Reproductive Health, Oakland, California, USA.
Sofia FilippaRollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Relebohile MotanaIbis Reproductive Health, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa.
Chiara BercuIbis Reproductive Health, Oakland, California, USA.
Ijeoma EgwuatuGeneration Initiative for Women and Youth Nigeria, Lagos, Nigeria.
Belen GrossoColectiva Feminista La Revuelta, Neuquen, Argentina.
Ika Ayu KristianingrumSamsara, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Sybil NmeziGeneration Initiative for Women and Youth Nigeria, Lagos, Nigeria.
Ruth ZurbriggenColectiva Feminista La Revuelta, Neuquen, Argentina.
Emmeline FriedmanIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Caitlin GerdtsIbis Reproductive Health, Oakland, California, USA.
Ibis Reproductive Health · USEmory University · USIbis Reproductive Health · ZAIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionA range of barriers deter or prevent people from accessing facility-based abortion care. As a result, people are obtaining and using abortifacient medications to end their pregnancies outside of the formal healthcare system, without clinical supervision. One model of self-managed abortion has come to be known as the 'accompaniment' model, in which grassroots organisations provide pregnant people with evidence-based counselling and support through the medication abortion process. Data are needed to understand the safety and effectiveness of this increasingly common model of abortion care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a large, prospective, observational study in Argentina and Nigeria. All people who contact one of two accompaniment groups seeking information for their own self-managed medication abortion, are ages 13 years and older, have no contraindications for medication abortion, are within the gestational range supported by the group (up to 12 weeks' gestation for the primary outcome) and are willing to be contacted for follow-up will be recruited. Participants will respond to an interviewer-administered baseline survey at enrolment, and 1-4 additional surveys over 6 weeks to ascertain whether they obtain medications for abortion, dosing and route of administration of medications, physical and emotional experience of medication abortion self-management, and effectiveness and safety outcomes. Analyses will include estimates of the primary outcome: the proportion of participants that report a complete abortion without surgical intervention at last recorded follow-up; as well as secondary outcomes including a pseudo-experimental test of non-inferiority of the effectiveness of self-managed medication abortion as compared with clinical medication abortion. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: We describe the ethical considerations and protections for this study, as well the creation of a study-specific Data Monitoring and Oversight Committee. We describe dissemination plans to ensure that study results are shared widely with all relevant audiences, particularly researchers, advocates, policymakers and clinicians. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN95769543.

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedAbortion, SpontaneousAdolescentArgentinaFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornNigeriaPregnancyProspective Studiesabortionaccompanimentmedication abortionmifepristonemisoprostolself-managed abortion

Identifiers

PMID33444174
PMCPMC7678383
OpenAlexW3105913362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.