Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33443693›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2021

Impact of Patient Access to Online VA Notes on Healthcare Utilization and Clinician Documentation: a Retrospective Cohort Study.

Amanda C Blok, Daniel J Amante, Timothy P Hogan, Rajani S Sadasivam, Stephanie L Shimada, Susan Woods, Kim M Nazi, Thomas K Houston

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Amanda C BlokVeterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, 2215 Fuller Road, Mail Stop 152, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. Amanda.Blok@va.gov.ORCID 0000-0002-5329-0393
Daniel J AmanteDivision of Health Informatics and Implementation Science, Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.
Timothy P HoganVeterans Affairs Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Veterans Affairs Bedford Medical Center, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Bedford, MA, USA.
Rajani S SadasivamDivision of Health Informatics and Implementation Science, Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.
Stephanie L ShimadaDivision of Health Informatics and Implementation Science, Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.
Susan WoodsMaine Behavioral Healthcare, South Portland, ME, USA.
Kim M NaziKMN Consulting Services, Coxsackie, NY, USA.
Thomas K HoustonLearning Health Systems, Department of Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
United States Department of Veterans Affairs · USUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · USBoston University · USMaineHealth · USWake Forest University · US

Funding

University of Massachusetts Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceKL2TR001455 · NCATS · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI KIEFE, CATARINA I. · 2015 to 2024
$5.0M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001455VA VA241-12-D-0224
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn an effort to foster patient engagement, some healthcare systems provide their patients with open notes, enabling them to access their clinical notes online. In January 2013, the Veterans Health Administration (VA) implemented online access to clinical notes ("VA Notes") through the Blue Button feature of its patient portal.

objectiveTo measure the association of online patient access to clinical notes with changes in healthcare utilization and clinician documentation behaviors.

designA retrospective cohort study. PATIENTS: Patients accessing My HealtheVet (MHV), the VA's online patient portal, between July 2011 and January 2015. MAIN MEASURES: Use of healthcare services (primary care clinic visits and online electronic secure messaging), and characteristics of physician clinical documentation (readability of notes). KEY

resultsAmong 882,575 unique portal users, those who accessed clinical notes (16.2%; N = 122,972) were younger, more racially homogenous (white), and less likely to be financially vulnerable. Compared with non-users, Notes users more frequently used the secure messaging feature on the portal (mean of 2.6 messages (SD 7.0) v. 0.87 messages (SD 3.3) in January-July 2013), but their higher use of secure messaging began prior to VA Notes implementation, and thus was not temporally related to the implementation. When comparing clinic visit rates pre- and post-implementation, Notes users had a small but significant increase in rate of 0.36 primary care clinic visits (2012 v. 2013) compared to portal users who did not view their Notes (p = 0.01). At baseline, the mean reading ease of primary care clinical notes was 53.8 (SD 10.1) and did not improve after implementation of VA Notes.

conclusionsVA Notes users were different than patients with portal access who did not view their notes online, and they had higher rates of healthcare service use prior to and after VA Notes implementation. Opportunities exist to improve clinical note access and readability.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsPatient PortalsDocumentationHumansPatient Acceptance of Health CareRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID33443693
PMCPMC7947092
OpenAlexW3119408304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.