ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2021
Cardiovascular fingolimod effects on rapid baroreceptor unloading are counterbalanced by baroreflex resetting.
Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- S1P receptor modulators and the cardiovascular autonomic nervous system in multiple sclerosis: a narrative review.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeInitial cardiovascular fingolimod effects might compromise baroreflex responses to rapid blood pressure (BP) changes during common Valsalva-like maneuvers. This study evaluated cardiovascular responses to Valsalva maneuver (VM)-induced baroreceptor unloading and loading upon fingolimod initiation. PATIENTS AND
methodsTwenty-one patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis performed VMs before and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 hours after fingolimod initiation. We recorded heart rate (HR) as RR intervals (RRI), systolic and diastolic BP (BPsys, BPdia) during VM phase 1, VM phase 2 early, VM phase 2 late, and VM phase 4. Using linear regression analysis between decreasing BPsys and RRI values during VM phase 2 early, we determined baroreflex gain (BRG) reflecting vagal withdrawal and sympathetic activation upon baroreceptor unloading. To assess cardiovagal activation upon baroreceptor loading, we calculated Valsalva ratios (VR) between maximal and minimal RRIs after strain release. Analysis of variance or Friedman tests with post hoc analysis compared corresponding parameters at the eight time points (significance: p < 0.05).
resultsRRIs at VM phase 1, VM phase 2 early, and VM phase 2 late were higher after than before fingolimod initiation, and maximal after 4 hours. Fingolimod did not affect the longest RRIs upon strain release, but after 3, 5, and 6 hours lowered the highest BPsys values during overshoot and all BPdia values, and thus reduced VRs. BRG was slightly higher after 3 and 5 hours, and significantly higher after 4 hours than before fingolimod initiation.
conclusionsVR-decreases 3-6 hours after fingolimod initiation are physiologic results of fingolimod-associated attenuations of BP and HR increases at the end of strain and do not suggest impaired cardiovagal activation upon baroreceptor loading. Stable and at the time of HR nadir significantly increased BRGs indicate improved responses to baroreceptor unloading. Thus, cardiovascular fingolimod effects do not impair autonomic responses to sudden baroreceptor loading or unloading but seem to be mitigated by baroreflex resetting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.