Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33443662›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2021

Prognostic model for patients with advanced cancer using a combination of routine blood test values.

Taeko Miyagi, Satoshi Miyata, Keita Tagami, Yusuke Hiratsuka, Mamiko Sato, Ikuo Takeda, Katsura Kohata, Noriaki Satake, Hiroaki Shimokawa, Akira Inoue

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Taeko MiyagiDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Tohoku University School of Medicine, 2-1 Seiryomachi, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8575, Japan. miyagi-ta@nifty.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1486-9685
Satoshi MiyataDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tohoku University School of Medicine, 2-1 Seiryomachi, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8575, Japan.
Keita TagamiDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Tohoku University School of Medicine, 2-1 Seiryomachi, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8575, Japan.
Yusuke HiratsukaDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Tohoku University School of Medicine, 2-1 Seiryomachi, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8575, Japan.
Mamiko SatoDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Tohoku University School of Medicine, 2-1 Seiryomachi, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8575, Japan.
Ikuo TakedaDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Tohoku University School of Medicine, 2-1 Seiryomachi, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8575, Japan.
Katsura KohataDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Tohoku University School of Medicine, 2-1 Seiryomachi, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8575, Japan.
Noriaki SatakeDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Tohoku University School of Medicine, 2-1 Seiryomachi, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8575, Japan.
Hiroaki ShimokawaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tohoku University School of Medicine, 2-1 Seiryomachi, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8575, Japan.
Akira InoueDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Tohoku University School of Medicine, 2-1 Seiryomachi, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8575, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to develop a simple prognostic model based on objective indicators alone, i.e., routine blood test data, without using any subjective variables such as patient's symptoms and physician's prediction.

methodsThe subjects of this retrospective study were patients at the palliative care unit of Tohoku University Hospital, Japan. Eligible patients were over 20 years old and had advanced cancer (n = 225). The model for predicting survival was developed based on Cox proportional hazards regression models for univariable and multivariable analyses of 20 items selected from routine blood test data. All the analyses were performed according to the TRIPOD statement ( https://www.tripod-statement.org/ ).

resultsThe univariable and multivariable regression analyses identified total bilirubin, creatinine, urea/creatinine ratio, aspartate aminotransferase, albumin, total leukocyte count, differential lymphocyte count, and platelet/lymphocyte ratio as significant risk factors for mortality. Based on the hazard ratios, the area under the curve for the new risk model was 0.87 for accuracy, 0.83 for sensitivity, and 0.74 for specificity. Diagnostic accuracy was higher than provided by the Palliative Prognostic Score and the Palliative Prognostic Index. The Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated a survival significance of classifying patients according to their score into low-, medium-, and high-mortality risk groups having median survival times of 67 days, 34 days, and 11 days, respectively (p < 0.001).

conclusionsWe developed a simple and accurate prognostic model for predicting the survival of patients with advanced cancer based on routine blood test values alone that may be useful for appropriate advanced care planning in a palliative care setting.

Indexed as

AgedFemaleHematologic TestsHumansMaleNeoplasmsPalliative CarePrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsAdvanced cancerBlood testsCox regression analysisPalliative carePrognostic model

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.