Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33443655›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2021

C-reactive protein and the neonatal early-onset sepsis calculator for the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis.

Nati Friedman, Sivan Yochpaz, Semyon Zirkin, Jacky Herzlich, Ronella Marom

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The diagnostic value of next-generation sequencing technology in sepsis.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nati FriedmanDepartment of Neonatology, Dana Dwek Children's Hospital, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel, affiliated to the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Sivan YochpazDepartment of Neonatology, Dana Dwek Children's Hospital, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel, affiliated to the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Semyon ZirkinDepartment of Neonatology, Dana Dwek Children's Hospital, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel, affiliated to the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Jacky HerzlichDepartment of Neonatology, Dana Dwek Children's Hospital, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel, affiliated to the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Ronella MaromDepartment of Neonatology, Dana Dwek Children's Hospital, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel, affiliated to the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. marom.ronella@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4019-7146
Tel Aviv University · ILTel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our aim was to evaluate the utility of the neonatal early-onset sepsis risk calculator (NEOSC) to the utility of C-reactive protein (CRP) for diagnosing neonatal EOS. This retrospective study reviewed the records of neonates who underwent sepsis workups due to equivocal symptoms and compared their CRP values to the calculator's recommendations and their cultures. A total of 382 newborns who underwent sepsis work-up due to equivocal symptoms were included in our study. The calculator's recommendations would have reduced the number of newborns who underwent sepsis workups by 82.5% and antibiotic treatment by 83.4% (n = 315). Considering that 373 of 382 (97.6%) ultimately had no sepsis, the calculator's specificity was higher than that of CRP (83.9% versus 76.1%). When comparing the maximal CRP value with the risk according to the neonatal sepsis calculator, a significant correlation was found between them (P < 0.01), but the relationship was not strong (Pearson's correlation = 0.27). We found a significant correlation between the risk of sepsis according to the NEOSC and the CRP values, although the correlation was not strong. The calculator's high specificity enables safe avoidance of multiple blood tests and antibiotic treatments for suspected neonates who are not infected. CRP tests can reduce the number of infected newborns the calculator may miss, at the cost of unnecessary blood tests and antibiotic therapy to many newborns.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsC-Reactive ProteinFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleNeonatal SepsisRetrospective StudiesAnti-Bacterial AgentsC-Reactive ProteinCrpEarly neonatal sepsisNeonatal sepsis risk calculatorNewborns

Identifiers

PMID33443655
OpenAlexW3121100861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.