Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33443588›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of pediatrics2021

Nipple shield use does not impact sucking dynamics in breastfeeding infants of mothers with nipple pain.

Viviane Silva Coentro, Sharon Lisa Perrella, Ching Tat Lai, Alethea Rea, Michael Dymock, Donna Tracy Geddes

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Viviane Silva CoentroSchool of Molecular Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Western Australia, M310, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, Western Australia, 6009, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0666-1486
Sharon Lisa PerrellaSchool of Molecular Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Western Australia, M310, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, Western Australia, 6009, Australia. sharon.perrella@uwa.edu.au.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7727-7767
Ching Tat LaiSchool of Molecular Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Western Australia, M310, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, Western Australia, 6009, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9025-4922
Alethea ReaMathematics and Statistics, Murdoch University, 90 South Street, Murdoch, Western Australia, 6150, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0750-7501
Michael DymockCentre for Applied Statistics, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, Western Australia, 6009, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4881-2860
Donna Tracy GeddesSchool of Molecular Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Western Australia, M310, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, Western Australia, 6009, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0431-7078
The University of Western Australia · AUMurdoch University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nipple shields (shield) may reduce pain during breastfeeding, but the impact on infant sucking dynamics is not known. We examined the effects of shield use on sucking dynamics, milk removal and nipple pain in two groups of breastfeeding dyads: pain group (PG): shield used for nipple pain; comparison group (CG): no breastfeeding difficulties. Twenty PG (6 ± 4 weeks postnatal) and 28 CG dyads (8 ± 6 weeks postnatal) attended 2 monitored breastfeeding sessions with shield use randomised. Within-subject outcomes were compared. PG: shield use did not affect intra-oral vacuum (peak p = 0.17, baseline p = 0.59), sucking frequency (p = 0.20) or milk transfer (40 mL vs 48 mL, p = 0.80; percentage of available milk removed (PAMR) 55% vs 57%, p = 0.88), and reduced McGill pain scores (p = 0.012). CG: shield use increased non-nutritive sucking (10% more, p = 0.049), and reduced nutritive sucking (18% less, p = 0.017) and milk transfer (63 mL vs 31 mL p < 0.001, PAMR 65% vs 36% p < 0.001). For both groups, feeding duration increased by 2 min (p < 0.0001) and non-nutritive portions of the feed increased with shield use.Conclusion: Nipple shield use improved maternal comfort and did not impact milk removal or sucking strength in PG, but significantly reduced milk transfer and nutritive sucking in CG. What is Known: • Mothers report that nipple shields reduce nipple pain and enable continued breastfeeding. • Concerns that nipple shield use may reduce milk transfer and alter infant sucking patterns are based on limited published evidence. What is New: • Nipple shield use is associated with a 25% reduction in pain scores in breastfeeding mothers with chronic nipple pain. • Milk transfer is not reduced in dyads that regularly use a shield for chronic nipple pain. • Intra-oral vacuums are not impacted by nipple shield use in mothers experiencing pain.

Indexed as

Breast FeedingMothersFemaleHumansInfantNipplesPainSucking BehaviorBreastfeedingNipple painNipple shieldSucking dynamics

Identifiers

PMID33443588
OpenAlexW3112224077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.