Trial reportClinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Cerebral Infarction With Thrombocytopenia.
Trial report in Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Safety of Antiplatelet Therapy in Noncardioembolic Ischemic Stroke With Thrombocytopenia: The CASE II Study.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Article
- Safety of early antiplatelet therapy for non-cardioembolic mild stroke patients with thrombocytopenia.Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2024Article
- Correlation Between Serum β2-GPI/oxLDL and the Risk of Cerebral Infarction in Patients with T2DM.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
- Serum 4-hydroxynonenal associates with the recurrence of patients with primary cerebral infarction.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the long-term safety and benefits of antiplatelet therapy in patients with cerebral infarction with thrombocytopenia, as evidence regarding this was limited. This cohort trial assessed patients with acute cerebral infarction with thrombocytopenia treated in the Neurology Department of Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital from January 2016 to December 2018, and enrolled patients were followed up for 9 months. The patients were divided into non-antiplatelet and antiplatelet groups based on the actual intake of antiplatelet drugs. Primary endpoints included hemorrhagic events, recurrence of cerebral infarction, and activity of daily living (ADL) score changes. To balance baseline clinical data, propensity score matching was applied, and there were finally 65 matched patients, including 30 and 35 in the antiplatelet and non-antiplatelet groups, respectively. There were no differences in hemorrhagic and cerebral infarction recurrence rates between the 2 groups. ADL score change was higher in the antiplatelet group than in the non-antiplatelet group (10 vs 5,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.