Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33443319›Full record

Trial reportJournal of intellectual disability research : JIDR2021

Comparison of energy intake assessed by image-assisted food records to doubly labelled water in adolescents with intellectual and developmental disabilities: a feasibility study.

L T Ptomey, E A Willis, K Reitmeier, M L Dreyer Gillette, J R Sherman, D K Sullivan

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

L T PtomeyDepartment of Internal Medicine, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
E A WillisCenter for Health Promotions and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
K ReitmeierDepartment of Internal Medicine, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
M L Dreyer GilletteDepartment of Pediatrics, Children's Mercy Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA.
J R ShermanDepartment of Internal Medicine, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
D K SullivanDepartment of Dietetics and Nutrition, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
University of Kansas Medical Center · USChildren's Mercy Hospital · USUniversity of Kansas · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Weight Management for Adolescents with IDDR01HD079642 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI DONNELLY, JOSEPH E. · 2015 to 2019
$2.8M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD079642
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are currently no validated methods for energy intake assessment in adolescents with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD). The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility of collecting 3-day image-assisted food records (IARs) and doubly labelled water (TDEE

methodsAdolescents with IDD completed a 14-day assessment of mean daily energy expenditure using doubly labelled water. Participants were asked to complete 3-day IARs twice during the 14-day period. To complete the IAR, participants were asked to fill out a hard copy food record over three consecutive days (two weekdays/one weekend day) and to take before and after digital images of all foods and beverages consumed using an iPad tablet provided by the study. Energy intake from the IAR was calculated using Nutrition Data System for Research. Mean differences, intraclass correlations and Bland-Altman limits of agreement were performed.

resultsNineteen adolescents with IDD, mean age 15.1 years, n = 6 (31.6%) female and n = 6 (31.6%) ethnic/racial minorities, enrolled in the trial. Participants successfully completed their 3-day food records and self-collected doubly labelled water urine samples for 100% of required days. Images were captured for 67.4 ± 30.1% of all meals recorded at assessment 1 and 72.3 ± 29.5% at assessment 2. The energy intake measured by IAR demonstrated acceptable test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation = 0.70). On average, IAR underestimated total energy intake by -299 ± 633 kcal/day (mean per cent error = -9.6 ± 22.2%); however, there was a large amount of individual variability in differences between the IAR and TDEE

conclusionsThe collection of IAR and TDEE

Indexed as

Developmental DisabilitiesWaterAdolescentChildDiet RecordsEnergy IntakeEthnic and Racial MinoritiesFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleReproducibility of ResultsWaterdietary assessmentdoubly labelled waterfood recordsintellectual and developmental disabilitiesphotos

Identifiers

PMID33443319
PMCPMC8499687
OpenAlexW3119705745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.