Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33443163›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2021

A phosphorylation-dependent switch in the disordered p53 transactivation domain regulates DNA binding.

Xun Sun, H Jane Dyson, Peter E Wright

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Citrullination negatively regulates the functions of the p53 protein and opposes its ubiquitination and degradation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The multifunctional proline-rich domain of p53 tumor suppressor.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Reviews on cancer · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. A tethering mechanism underlies Pin1-catalyzed prolineProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xun SunDepartment of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037.ORCID 0000-0002-8079-5530
H Jane DysonDepartment of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037.ORCID 0000-0001-6855-3398
Peter E WrightDepartment of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037 wright@scripps.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-1368-0223
Scripps Research Institute · US

Funding

Protein Dynamics in Dihydrofolate Reductase CatalysisR01GM075995 · NIGMS · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI WRIGHT, PETER EDWIN · 2006 to 2021
$6.1M
Structural Studies of Large Dynamic ComplexesR35GM131693 · NIGMS · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI DYSON, HELEN JANE · 2019 to 2023
$2.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM075995NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM131693
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The tumor-suppressor p53 is a critical regulator of the cellular response to DNA damage and is tightly regulated by posttranslational modifications. Thr55 in the AD2 interaction motif of the N-terminal transactivation domain functions as a phosphorylation-dependent regulatory switch that modulates p53 activity. Thr55 is constitutively phosphorylated, becomes dephosphorylated upon DNA damage, and is subsequently rephosphorylated to facilitate dissociation of p53 from promoters and inactivate p53-mediated transcription. Using NMR and fluorescence spectroscopy, we show that Thr55 phosphorylation inhibits DNA-binding by enhancing competitive interactions between the disordered AD2 motif and the structured DNA-binding domain (DBD). Nonphosphorylated p53 exhibits positive cooperativity in binding DNA as a tetramer. Upon phosphorylation of Thr55, cooperativity is abolished and p53 binds initially to cognate DNA sites as a dimer. As the concentration of phosphorylated p53 is further increased, a second dimer binds and causes p53 to dissociate from the DNA, resulting in a bell-shaped binding curve. This autoinhibition is driven by favorable interactions between the DNA-binding surface of the DBD and the multiple phosphorylated AD2 motifs within the tetramer. These interactions are augmented by additional phosphorylation of Ser46 and are fine-tuned by the proline-rich domain (PRD). Removal of the PRD strengthens the AD2-DBD interaction and leads to autoinhibition of DNA binding even in the absence of Thr55 phosphorylation. This study reveals the molecular mechanism by which the phosphorylation status of Thr55 modulates DNA binding and controls both activation and termination of p53-mediated transcriptional programs at different stages of the cellular DNA damage response.

Indexed as

Proline-Rich Protein DomainsBinding SitesDimerizationDNADNA-Binding ProteinsFluorescence PolarizationGene ExpressionMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMutationPhosphorylationProtein BindingProtein DomainsProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalRecombinant ProteinsSequence DeletionSpectrometry, FluorescenceDNADNA-Binding ProteinsRecombinant ProteinsTP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53cooperative dissociationintramolecular interactionintrinsically disordered proteinp53 regulationposttranslational modification

Identifiers

PMID33443163
PMCPMC7817127
OpenAlexW3115309223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.