SynthesisOpen heart2020
Systematic review of clinical guidelines for lipid lowering in the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease events.
Synthesis in Open heart, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic review of clinical guidelines for lipid lowering in the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease events.Open heart · 2020Pooled it
- Systematic review of clinical guidance for lipid management in adults with or at risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: A global perspective.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2026Review
- Sex differences in monitoring and achievement of blood pressure and LDL-cholesterol targets in chronic coronary syndrome.Upsala journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- Time in LDL cholesterol target range and major adverse cardiovascular events risk: A pooled analysis of two cohorts.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2025Article
- Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease landscape in Singapore.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- Cost analysis of the WHO-HEARTS program for hypertension control and CVD prevention in primary health facilities in Ethiopia.Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Secondary prevention and follow-up of patients with ACS and not-at-target LDL: An Italian real-world retro-prospective analysis by the inertia group.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2023Article
- Article
- Preformulation Studies of Ezetimibe-Simvastatin Solid Dispersions in the Development of Fixed-Dose Combinations.Pharmaceutics · 2022Article
- Article
- Transient Ischaemic Attack in a Patient With Conn Syndrome: A Case Report and Literature Review on the Importance of Identifying Secondary Hypertension.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe WHO recommends that those with established cardiovascular disease should be treated with lipid-lowering therapy, but there is no specific guidance regarding lipid monitoring. Unnecessary general practitioner visits may be a burden for patients and increase healthcare costs. A systematic review of the current guidelines was performed to reveal gaps in the evidence base for optimal lipid monitoring approaches.
methodsFor this systematic review, a search of Medline, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature and Turning Research Into Practice databases was conducted for relevant guidelines published in the 10 years prior to 31 December 2019. Recommendations surrounding the frequency of testing, lipid-lowering therapies and target cholesterol values were compared qualitatively. Each guideline was assessed using the 2009 Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II tool.
resultsTwenty-two guidelines were included. All recommended statins as the primary lipid-lowering therapy, with a high level of supporting evidence. Considerable variation was found in the recommendations for cholesterol targets. Seventeen guidelines provided at least one cholesterol target, which for low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol ranged between 1.0 and 2.6 mmol/L, although the most frequently recommended was <1.8 mmol/L (n=12). For long-term follow-up, many recommended reviewing patients annually (n=9), although there was some variation in recommendations for the interval of between 3 and 12 months. Supporting evidence for any approach was limited, often being derived from clinical opinion.
conclusionsFurther research is required to provide an evidence base for optimal lipid monitoring of the on-statin secondary prevention population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.