Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33443074›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2021

Contribution of the Pulvinar and Lateral Geniculate Nucleus to the Control of Visually Guided Saccades in Blindsight Monkeys.

Norihiro Takakuwa, Kaoru Isa, Hirotaka Onoe, Jun Takahashi, Tadashi Isa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. From error to evidence: blindsight in the making†.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Complementary Organization of Mouse Driver and Modulator Cortico-thalamo-cortical Circuits.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Remodeling of lateral geniculate nucleus projections to extrastriate area MT following long-term lesions of striate cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Norihiro TakakuwaDepartment of Neuroscience, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4075-5697
Kaoru IsaDepartment of Neuroscience, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9254-5865
Hirotaka OnoeDepartment of Neuroscience, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan.
Jun TakahashiDepartment of Clinical Application, Center for iPS Cell Research and Application, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.
Tadashi IsaDepartment of Neuroscience, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan isa.tadashi.7u@kyoto-u.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0001-5652-4688

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After damage to the primary visual cortex (V1), conscious vision is impaired. However, some patients can respond to visual stimuli presented in their lesion-affected visual field using residual visual pathways bypassing V1. This phenomenon is called "blindsight." Many studies have tried to identify the brain regions responsible for blindsight, and the pulvinar and/or lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) are suggested to play key roles as the thalamic relay of visual signals. However, there are critical problems regarding these preceding studies in that subjects with different sized lesions and periods of time after lesioning were investigated; furthermore, the ability of blindsight was assessed with different measures. In this study, we used double dissociation to clarify the roles of the pulvinar and LGN by pharmacological inactivation of each region and investigated the effects in a simple task with visually guided saccades (VGSs) using monkeys with a unilateral V1 lesion, by which nearly all of the contralesional visual field was affected. Inactivating either the ipsilesional pulvinar or LGN impaired VGS toward a visual stimulus in the affected field. In contrast, inactivation of the contralesional pulvinar had no clear effect, but inactivation of the contralesional LGN impaired VGS to the intact visual field. These results suggest that the pulvinar and LGN play key roles in performing the simple VGS task after V1 lesioning, and that the visuomotor functions of blindsight monkeys were supported by plastic changes in the visual pathway involving the pulvinar, which emerged after V1 lesioning.

Indexed as

AnimalsFemaleFunctional LateralityGeniculate BodiesMacaca fuscataPhotic StimulationPulvinarSaccadesVisual CortexVisual PathwaysVisual Perceptionblindsightlateral geniculate nucleusmonkeypulvinarsaccadic eye movement

Identifiers

PMID33443074
PMCPMC8115889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.