ArticleThoracic cancer2021
Coexistence of atypical adenomatous hyperplasia, minimally invasive adenocarcinoma and invasive adenocarcinoma: Gene mutation analysis.
Article in Thoracic cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- The infiltration risk prediction models by logistic regression for ground-glass pulmonary nodules: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Next-generation sequencing in early-stage multiple primary lung cancer: The prognostic significance of genomic accumulation status and BCL2L11Translational oncology · 2025Article
- The Current Roadmap of Lung Cancer Biology, Genomics and Racial Disparity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- [Hypothesis of Genetic Diversity Selection in the Occurrence and Development of Lung Cancer: Molecular Evolution and Clinical Significance].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Multiple primary lung cancer (MPLC) refers to the simultaneous occurrence of two or more lung primary malignant tumors in one individual. The detection rate of MPLC has increased significantly in recent years, and the distinction between MPLC and lung metastasis has strong clinical significance. Whole exome sequencing (WES) can clearly identify the heterogeneity between MPLC nodules. Here, we report a case of a 50-year-old Asian female without a history of smoking. She underwent a lung computed tomography (CT) scan and three ground-glass nodules (GGNs) were found which were pathologically confirmed as atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH), minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) and invasive adenocarcinoma (IA), respectively. We performed WES on the three pulmonary nodules and analyzed the sequencing results. We believe that this is the first published report of a case of "three phases" of lung adenocarcinoma analyzed by WES. Under the same genetic background and internal environment, these three nodules showed significant genetic differences and developed into "three phases" of lung adenocarcinoma. Analysis of the WES results supported the lung adenocarcinoma model from AAH to MIA and IA, and explored possible potential driver genes and therapeutic targets. KEY POINTS: SIGNIFICANT FINDINGS OF THE STUDY: We used WES to analyze the gene mutation status of three tumors in one individual. We found that even if under the same genetic background, AAH, MIA and IA showed significant genetic differences and developed into "three phases" of lung adenocarcinoma. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: Analysis of the WES results supported the lung adenocarcinoma model from AAH to MIA and IA, and explored possible potential driver genes and therapeutic targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.