Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33442910›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary internal medicine2021

Effect of aerosolized bacterial lysate on development of naturally occurring respiratory disease in beef calves.

Laura L Bassel, Emily I Kaufman, Sarah-Nicole A Alsop, Jordan Buchan, Joanne Hewson, Erin E McCandless, Raksha Tiwari, Shayan Sharif, Ksenia Vulikh, Jeff L Caswell

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial, Veterinary
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary internal medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. NovelFrontiers in immunology · 2025
    Article
  3. Laboratory investigation of cases of fatal bacterial pneumonia in dairy cows.The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Laura L BasselDepartment of Pathobiology, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Emily I KaufmanDepartment of Pathobiology, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Sarah-Nicole A AlsopDepartment of Pathobiology, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Jordan BuchanDepartment of Pathobiology, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Joanne HewsonDepartment of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Erin E McCandlessGlobal Therapeutics Research, Veterinary Medicine Research and Development, Zoetis Inc., Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA.
Raksha TiwariGlobal Therapeutics Research, Veterinary Medicine Research and Development, Zoetis Inc., Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA.
Shayan SharifDepartment of Pathobiology, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Ksenia VulikhDepartment of Pathobiology, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Jeff L CaswellDepartment of Pathobiology, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1991-3219
University of Guelph · CAZoetis (United States) · US

Funding

Beef Farmers of Ontario 17-02Canadian Beef Cattle Research Council ANH 13.17Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada CRDPJ 476331Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs UofG2013-1488Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs UofG2013-27337Zoetis
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBovine respiratory disease (BRD) is a major problem affecting beef cattle after arrival to feedlots. Alternatives to antibiotics are needed for prevention. HYPOTHESIS: Stimulation of pulmonary innate immune responses at the time of arrival to a feedlot reduces the occurrence and severity of BRD. ANIMALS: Sixty beef steers at high risk of BRD.

methodsRandomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. Calves received saline or a lysate of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli by aerosol, at 16 hours after feedlot arrival. Calves were monitored for 28 days for disease outcomes and levels of Mycoplasma bovis and Mannheimia haemolytica in nasal swabs.

resultsDeath from M bovis pneumonia was significantly greater in lysate-treated animals (6/29, 24%) compared to controls (1/29, 3%; odds ratio = 10.2; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.1-96.0; P = .04). By 28 days after arrival, 29/29 lysate-treated calves had ultrasonographic pulmonary consolidation compared to 24/29 control calves (P = .05). Lysate-treated calves had lower weight gain compared to control calves (-8.8 kg, 95% CI = -17.1 to -0.5; P = .04), and higher body temperatures on days 4, 7, and 21 (0.19°C; 95% CI = 0.01-0.37; P = .04). Nasal M bovis numbers increased over time and were higher in lysate-treated calves (0.76 log CFU, 95% CI = 0.3-1.2; P = .001). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Aerosol administration of a bacterial lysate exacerbated BRD in healthy high-risk beef calves, suggesting that respiratory tract inflammation adversely affects how calves respond to subsequent natural infection with M bovis and other respiratory pathogens.

Indexed as

Cattle DiseasesMannheimia haemolyticaMycoplasma bovisRespiratory Tract DiseasesAnimalsBacterial LysatesCattleCell ExtractsBacterial LysatesBroncho-VaxomCell Extractscattleimmunostimulationinflammationinnate immunityMycoplasma bovispneumoniatrained immunityultrasound

Identifiers

PMID33442910
PMCPMC7848379
OpenAlexW3121101609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.