Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33442889›Full record

ArticleLasers in surgery and medicine2021

Automated Extraction of Skin Wound Healing Biomarkers From In Vivo Label-Free Multiphoton Microscopy Using Convolutional Neural Networks.

Jake D Jones, Marcos R Rodriguez, Kyle P Quinn

Open access · greenAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Lasers in surgery and medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Advances in wound care · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Label-Free Optical Metabolic Imaging in Cells and Tissues.Annual review of biomedical engineering · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jake D JonesDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas.ORCID 0000-0002-6407-8726
Marcos R RodriguezDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas.ORCID 0000-0003-2883-3971
Kyle P QuinnDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas.ORCID 0000-0002-6876-3608
University of Arkansas at Fayetteville · US

Funding

In vivo label-free characterization of aged skin to predict delayed wound healingR01AG056560 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS AT FAYETTEVILLE · PI QUINN, KYLE PATRICK · 2017 to 2021
$1.7M
Non-invasive label-free quantitative imaging for chronic wound characterizationR00EB017723 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS AT FAYETTEVILLE · PI QUINN, KYLE PATRICK · 2015 to 2017
$745k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG056560NIBIB NIH HHS R00 EB017723
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesHistological analysis is a gold standard technique for studying impaired skin wound healing. Label-free multiphoton microscopy (MPM) can provide natural image contrast similar to histological sections and quantitative metabolic information using NADH and FAD autofluorescence. However, MPM analysis requires time-intensive manual segmentation of specific wound tissue regions limiting the practicality and usage of the technology for monitoring wounds. The goal of this study was to train a series of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to segment MPM images of skin wounds to automate image processing and quantification of wound geometry and metabolism. STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND

methodsTwo CNNs with a 4-layer U-Net architecture were trained to segment unstained skin wound tissue sections and in vivo z-stacks of the wound edge. The wound section CNN used 380 distinct MPM images while the in vivo CNN used 5,848 with both image sets being randomly distributed to training, validation, and test sets following a 70%, 20%, and 10% split. The accuracy of each network was evaluated on the test set of images, and the effectiveness of automated measurement of wound geometry and optical redox ratio were compared with hand traced outputs of six unstained wound sections and 69 wound edge z-stacks from eight mice.

resultsThe MPM wound section CNN had an overall accuracy of 92.83%. Measurements of epidermal/dermal thickness, wound depth, wound width, and % re-epithelialization were within 10% error when evaluated on six full wound sections from days 3, 5, and 10 post-wounding that were not included in the training set. The in vivo wound z-stack CNN had an overall accuracy of 89.66% and was able to isolate the wound edge epithelium in z-stacks from eight mice across post-wound time points to quantify the optical redox ratio within 5% of what was recorded by manual segmentations.

conclusionThe CNNs trained and presented in this study can accurately segment MPM imaged wound sections and in vivo z-stacks to enable automated and rapid calculation of wound geometry and metabolism. Although MPM is a noninvasive imaging modality well suited to imaging living wound tissue, its use has been limited by time-intensive user segmentation. The use of CNNs for automated image segmentation demonstrate that it is possible for MPM to deliver near real-time quantitative readouts of tissue structure and function. Lasers Surg. Med. © 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Indexed as

MicroscopyNeural Networks, ComputerAnimalsBiomarkersImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMiceWound HealingBiomarkersconvolutional neural networkdeep learningin vivomultiphoton microscopyoptical redox ratiosegmentationwound healing

Identifiers

PMID33442889
PMCPMC8275674
OpenAlexW3118911822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.