Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33442852›Full record

ReviewLasers in medical science2022

A comparison of the clinical effects of thinning and drilling on laser-assisted hatching.

Yujiang Wang, Chuangqi Chen, Jiaying Liang, Lin Fan, Dun Liu, Xiqian Zhang, Fenghua Liu

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Lasers in medical science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yujiang WangDepartment of Reproductive Medical Center, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, No. 521 Xingnan Road, Panyu District, Guangzhou, 511442, Guangdong Province, China.
Chuangqi ChenDepartment of Reproductive Medical Center, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, No. 521 Xingnan Road, Panyu District, Guangzhou, 511442, Guangdong Province, China.
Jiaying LiangDepartment of Reproductive Medical Center, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, No. 521 Xingnan Road, Panyu District, Guangzhou, 511442, Guangdong Province, China.
Lin FanDepartment of Reproductive Medical Center, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, No. 521 Xingnan Road, Panyu District, Guangzhou, 511442, Guangdong Province, China.
Dun LiuDepartment of Reproductive Medical Center, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, No. 521 Xingnan Road, Panyu District, Guangzhou, 511442, Guangdong Province, China.
Xiqian ZhangDepartment of Reproductive Medical Center, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, No. 521 Xingnan Road, Panyu District, Guangzhou, 511442, Guangdong Province, China.
Fenghua LiuDepartment of Reproductive Medical Center, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, No. 521 Xingnan Road, Panyu District, Guangzhou, 511442, Guangdong Province, China. liushine2006@163.com.
Guangdong Province Women and Children Hospital · CN

Funding

he Medical Scientific Technological Research Funding of Guangdong Province, China A2020061the Medical Scientific Technological Research Funding of Guangdong Province, China B2019019The Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province 2016A030313817
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To systematically investigate the effects of two methods used for laser-assisted hatching (LAH) on clinical outcomes after day 4 (D4) on frozen-embryo-transfer (FET) cycles. Data from 11471 infertile patients who underwent FET cycles between January 2014 and October 2018 was retrospectively analyzed. The 1410 patients who met the inclusion criteria were further categorized into two groups based on the hatching procedure used: the thinning laser-assisted hatching group (T-LAH, 716 patients), and the drilling laser-assisted hatching group (D-LAH, 694 patients). The baseline characteristics of the patients were consistent between the two groups. However, the rates of implantation and clinical pregnancy were significantly higher in the T-LAH group compared to the D-LAH group (32.73% vs. 29.09%, P < 0.01, and 50.98% vs. 43.95%, P < 0.01). The proportion of live birth was also higher in the T-LAH group, but the difference was insignificant (39.11% vs. 36.89%, P > 0.05). Moreover, there were no significant differences in rates of miscarriages, multiple pregnancies, ectopic pregnancies, preterm births, and congenital disabilities between the two groups. Nonetheless, significantly higher rates of implantation and pregnancy were reported in the T-LAH group compared to the D-LAH group among patients aged <35 years, patients with at least one previously failed cycle, and patients with an endometrial thickness of 8-10 mm. T-LAH is superior to D-LAH in improving clinical implantation and pregnancy outcomes in D4 FET, particularly in patients aged <35 years with at least one previously failed cycle or an endometrial thickness of 8-10 mm. The findings of this study provide theoretical support for clinical individualized diagnosis and treatment of patients with infertility.

Indexed as

Embryo ImplantationEmbryo TransferFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornLasersPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeRetrospective StudiesClinical pregnancy;Frozen embryo transfer;ImplantationLaser-assisted hatching;

Identifiers

PMID33442852
PMCPMC8803699
OpenAlexW3119045617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.