Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33442579›Full record

ReviewDigital biomarkers2020

Precompetitive Consensus Building to Facilitate the Use of Digital Health Technologies to Support Parkinson Disease Drug Development through Regulatory Science.

Diane Stephenson, Robert Alexander, Varun Aggarwal, Reham Badawy, Lisa Bain, Roopal Bhatnagar, Bastiaan R Bloem, Babak Boroojerdi, Jackson Burton, Jesse M Cedarbaum and 32 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Digital biomarkers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Transforming Drug Development for Neurological Disorders: Proceedings from a Multidisease Area Workshop.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

42 authors at 18 institutions in 6 countries.

Diane StephensonCritical Path Institute, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Robert AlexanderTakeda, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Varun AggarwalCritical Path Institute, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Reham BadawyUniversity of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Lisa BainIndependent Medical Writer, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Roopal BhatnagarCritical Path Institute, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Bastiaan R BloemRadboud University Medical Centre, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Department of Neurology, Center of Expertise for Parkinson and Movement Disorders, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Babak BoroojerdiUCB Biopharma, Brussels, Belgium.
Jackson BurtonCritical Path Institute, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Jesse M CedarbaumCritical Path Institute, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Josh CosmanBiogen, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
David T DexterParkinson's UK, London, United Kingdom.
Marissa DockendorfMerck & Co. (MSD), Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA.
E Ray DorseyUniversity of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA.
Ariel V DowlingTakeda, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Luc J W EversRadboud University Medical Centre, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Department of Neurology, Center of Expertise for Parkinson and Movement Disorders, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Katherine FisherBiogen, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Mark FrasierMichael J. Fox Foundation, New York, New York, USA.
Luis Garcia-GancedoGlaxoSmithKline, Stevenage, United Kingdom.
Jennifer C GoldsackDigital Medicine Society, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Derek HillCritical Path Institute, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Janice HitchcockCritical Path Institute, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Michele T HuNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Michael P LawtonCritical Path Institute, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Susan J LeeMerck & Co. (MSD), Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA.
Michael LindemannF. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland.
Ken MarekInstitute of Neurodegenerative Diseases, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Nitin MehrotraMerck & Co. (MSD), Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA.
Marjan J MeindersRadboud University Medical Centre, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Department of Neurology, Center of Expertise for Parkinson and Movement Disorders, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Michael MinchikCritical Path Institute, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Lauren OlivaBiogen, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Klaus RomeroCritical Path Institute, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
George RoussosCritical Path Institute, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Robert RubensTakeda, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Sakshi SadarCritical Path Institute, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Joseph ScheerenCritical Path Institute, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Eiichi SengokuUCB Biopharma, Brussels, Belgium.
Tanya SimuniNorthwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA.
Glenn StebbinsRush University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Kirsten I TaylorF. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland.
Beatrice YangLundbeck, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Neta ZachTakeda, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Critical Path Institute · USTakeda (United States) · USBiogen (United States) · USMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) · USRadboud University Nijmegen · NLRoche (Switzerland) · CHUCB Pharma (Belgium) · BEGlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom) · GBInstitute for Neurodegenerative Disorders · USLundbeck (Denmark) · DKMichael J. Fox Foundation · USNorthwestern University · USOldham Council · GBParkinson's UK · GBRush University · USUniversity of Birmingham · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity of Rochester · US

Funding

FDA HHS U18 FD005320Medical Research Council MC_EX_MR/N50192X/1Medical Research Council MR/L023784/1Medical Research Council MR/M024962/1Parkinson's UK J-0901
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Innovative tools are urgently needed to accelerate the evaluation and subsequent approval of novel treatments that may slow, halt, or reverse the relentless progression of Parkinson disease (PD). Therapies that intervene early in the disease continuum are a priority for the many candidates in the drug development pipeline. There is a paucity of sensitive and objective, yet clinically interpretable, measures that can capture meaningful aspects of the disease. This poses a major challenge for the development of new therapies and is compounded by the considerable heterogeneity in clinical manifestations across patients and the fluctuating nature of many signs and symptoms of PD. Digital health technologies (DHT), such as smartphone applications, wearable sensors, and digital diaries, have the potential to address many of these gaps by enabling the objective, remote, and frequent measurement of PD signs and symptoms in natural living environments. The current climate of the COVID-19 pandemic creates a heightened sense of urgency for effective implementation of such strategies. In order for these technologies to be adopted in drug development studies, a regulatory-aligned consensus on best practices in implementing appropriate technologies, including the collection, processing, and interpretation of digital sensor data, is required. A growing number of collaborative initiatives are being launched to identify effective ways to advance the use of DHT in PD clinical trials. The Critical Path for Parkinson's Consortium of the Critical Path Institute is highlighted as a case example where stakeholders collectively engaged regulatory agencies on the effective use of DHT in PD clinical trials. Global regulatory agencies, including the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency, are encouraging the efficiencies of data-driven engagements through multistakeholder consortia. To this end, we review how the advancement of DHT can be most effectively achieved by aligning knowledge, expertise, and data sharing in ways that maximize efficiencies.

Indexed as

CollaborationConsensusDevice agnosticDigital health technologiesPublic-private partnershipsRegulatory science

Identifiers

PMID33442579
PMCPMC7768153
OpenAlexW3109533980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.