ReviewDigital biomarkers2020
Precompetitive Consensus Building to Facilitate the Use of Digital Health Technologies to Support Parkinson Disease Drug Development through Regulatory Science.
Review in Digital biomarkers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.
- Characterizing gait in people with multiple sclerosis using digital data from smartphone sensors: A proposed framework.Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) · 2025Pooled it
- Review
- From past to future: Digital approaches to success of clinical drug trials for Parkinson's disease.Journal of Parkinson's disease · 2026Review
- The future of clinical trials? Monitoring mobility as an outcome measure in Parkinson's disease: The mobilise-D study.Journal of Parkinson's disease · 2026Article
- Insights on Clinical Development of Cell and Gene Therapy for Rare Diseases-by DahShu Innovative Design Scientific Working Group (IDSWG).Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2025Review
- Aligning with regulatory agencies for the use of digital health technologies in drug development: a case study from Parkinson's disease.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Review
- Accelerating Parkinson's Disease drug development with federated learning approaches.NPJ Parkinson's disease · 2024Review
- Digital biomarkers for precision diagnosis and monitoring in Parkinson's disease.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Review
- Quantitative Gait and Balance Outcomes for Ataxia Trials: Consensus Recommendations by the Ataxia Global Initiative Working Group on Digital-Motor Biomarkers.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2024Review
- Remote at-home wearable-based gait assessments in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy compared to Parkinson's Disease.BMC neurology · 2023Article
- Challenges and best practices for digital unstructured data enrichment in health research: A systematic narrative review.PLOS digital health · 2023Article
- Transforming Drug Development for Neurological Disorders: Proceedings from a Multidisease Area Workshop.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2023Article
- Toward Personalized Medicine Approaches for Parkinson Disease Using Digital Technologies.JMIR formative research · 2023Review
- An Exploration of Wearable Device Features Used in UK Hospital Parkinson Disease Care: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- Incorporating digitally derived endpoints within clinical development programs by leveraging prior work.NPJ digital medicine · 2023Article
- Digital technologies: Innovations that transform the face of drug development.Clinical and translational science · 2023Review
- Digital health technology derived measures: Biomarkers or clinical outcome assessments?Clinical and translational science · 2023Review
- Evolving regulatory perspectives on digital health technologies for medicinal product development.NPJ digital medicine · 2023Review
- Empowering drug development: Leveraging insights from imaging technologies to enable the advancement of digital health technologies.Clinical and translational science · 2023Review
- Identifying and characterising sources of variability in digital outcome measures in Parkinson's disease.NPJ digital medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
42 authors at 18 institutions in 6 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Innovative tools are urgently needed to accelerate the evaluation and subsequent approval of novel treatments that may slow, halt, or reverse the relentless progression of Parkinson disease (PD). Therapies that intervene early in the disease continuum are a priority for the many candidates in the drug development pipeline. There is a paucity of sensitive and objective, yet clinically interpretable, measures that can capture meaningful aspects of the disease. This poses a major challenge for the development of new therapies and is compounded by the considerable heterogeneity in clinical manifestations across patients and the fluctuating nature of many signs and symptoms of PD. Digital health technologies (DHT), such as smartphone applications, wearable sensors, and digital diaries, have the potential to address many of these gaps by enabling the objective, remote, and frequent measurement of PD signs and symptoms in natural living environments. The current climate of the COVID-19 pandemic creates a heightened sense of urgency for effective implementation of such strategies. In order for these technologies to be adopted in drug development studies, a regulatory-aligned consensus on best practices in implementing appropriate technologies, including the collection, processing, and interpretation of digital sensor data, is required. A growing number of collaborative initiatives are being launched to identify effective ways to advance the use of DHT in PD clinical trials. The Critical Path for Parkinson's Consortium of the Critical Path Institute is highlighted as a case example where stakeholders collectively engaged regulatory agencies on the effective use of DHT in PD clinical trials. Global regulatory agencies, including the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency, are encouraging the efficiencies of data-driven engagements through multistakeholder consortia. To this end, we review how the advancement of DHT can be most effectively achieved by aligning knowledge, expertise, and data sharing in ways that maximize efficiencies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.