Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33442557›Full record

ArticleNeurophotonics2021

Best practices for fNIRS publications.

Meryem A Yücel, Alexander V Lühmann, Felix Scholkmann, Judit Gervain, Ippeita Dan, Hasan Ayaz, David Boas, Robert J Cooper, Joseph Culver, Clare E Elwell and 12 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurophotonics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 377 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
377citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

377 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

317 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Meryem A YücelBoston University, Neurophotonics Center, Biomedical Engineering, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4291-2847
Alexander V LühmannBoston University, Neurophotonics Center, Biomedical Engineering, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4995-293X
Felix ScholkmannUniversity Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Department of Neonatology, Biomedical Optics Research Laboratory, Neonatology Research, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1748-4852
Judit GervainUniversité de Paris, CNRS, Integrative Neuroscience and Cognition Center, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2125-6369
Ippeita DanChuo University, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Applied Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, Tokyo, Japan.
Hasan AyazDrexel University, School of Biomedical Engineering, Science and Health Systems, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5514-2741
David BoasBoston University, Neurophotonics Center, Biomedical Engineering, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6709-7711
Robert J CooperUniversity College London, DOT-HUB, Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Biomedical Optics Research Laboratory, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6696-8020
Joseph CulverWashington University School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, St. Louis, Missouri, United States.
Clare E ElwellUniversity College London, Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, London, United Kingdom.
Adam EggebrechtWashington University School of Medicine, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, St. Louis, Missouri, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6320-2676
Maria A FranceschiniMassachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, MGH/HST Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Charlestown, Massachusetts, United States.
Christophe GrovaConcordia University, Department of Physics and PERFORM Centre, Multimodal Functional Imaging Lab, Montreal, Québec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2775-9968
Fumitaka HomaeTokyo Metropolitan University, Department of Language Sciences, Tokyo, Japan.
Frédéric LesagePolytechnique Montréal, Department Electrical Engineering, Montreal, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3699-1283
Hellmuth ObrigUniversity Hospital Leipzig, Max-Planck-Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences and Clinic for Cognitive Neurology, Leipzig, Germany.
Ilias TachtsidisUniversity College London, Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8125-0313
Sungho TakKorea Basic Science Institute, Research Center for Bioconvergence Analysis, Ochang, Cheongju, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3836-0082
Yunjie TongWeldon School of Biomedical Engineering Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6052-8913
Alessandro TorricelliPolitecnico di Milano, Dipartimento di Fisica, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6878-8936
Heidrun WabnitzPhysikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3846-8659
Martin WolfUniversity Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Department of Neonatology, Biomedical Optics Research Laboratory, Neonatology Research, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

The Neuroscience of Everyday World- A novel wearable system for continuous measurement of brain functionU01EB029856 · NIBIB · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI BOAS, DAVID A, KIRAN, SWATHI · 2020 to 2024
$6.5M
Establishing an fNIRS Ecosystem for Open Software-Hardware DisseminationR24NS104096 · NINDS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI BOAS, DAVID A · 2018 to 2021
$1.1M
NIBIB NIH HHS U01 EB029856NINDS NIH HHS R24 NS104096
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The application of functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) in the neurosciences has been expanding over the last 40 years. Today, it is addressing a wide range of applications within different populations and utilizes a great variety of experimental paradigms. With the rapid growth and the diversification of research methods, some inconsistencies are appearing in the way in which methods are presented, which can make the interpretation and replication of studies unnecessarily challenging. The Society for Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy has thus been motivated to organize a representative (but not exhaustive) group of leaders in the field to build a consensus on the best practices for describing the methods utilized in fNIRS studies. Our paper has been designed to provide guidelines to help enhance the reliability, repeatability, and traceability of reported fNIRS studies and encourage best practices throughout the community. A checklist is provided to guide authors in the preparation of their manuscripts and to assist reviewers when evaluating fNIRS papers.

Indexed as

functional near-infrared spectroscopyguidelinespublication best practices

Identifiers

PMID33442557
PMCPMC7793571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.